Browse Cases

Central District of California

In the case of Kenneth Davidson v. Alex Cheung et al, docket number 25-cv-11445, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This rule allows a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves

Central District of California

In the case United States of America v. Iconic Hearts Holdings Inc. et al, filed under docket number 25-cv-09310, the government initiated legal action against Iconic Hearts Holdings Inc. and associated parties. The case appears to have been subject to a dismissal motion, as indicated by the docket entry referencing a

Central District of California

In the case 2:23-cv-06191 Matthew Spatola v. Jason Desrouleaux et al, the plaintiff, Matthew Spatola, has brought a legal action against Jason Desrouleaux and other defendants. The matter involves a dispute that has progressed to the stage where a trial brief has been filed, indicating preparation for trial

Central District of California

HL Marks has initiated a civil lawsuit against Viking Cruises USA Ltd, with the case docketed under number 25-cv-05287. The suit appears to involve procedural developments, including the setting or resetting of deadlines and hearings, as indicated by recent docket activity. Specific details about the claims or

Central District of California

The United States government filed a civil action against Sarisyan under docket number 25-mj-03138. The case involves issues related to excludable delay, which typically concerns the calculation of time periods excluded from the speedy trial clock under the Speedy Trial Act or similar procedural rules. Although the

Central District of California

Cascade Drilling L.P. filed a motion seeking to reset deadlines in its ongoing civil litigation against Regenesis Bioremediation. The case, docket number 23-cv-02108, involves procedural requests to adjust the schedule for hearings or other case management deadlines. The motion aims to provide additional time for the

Central District of California

In the civil case titled Jesse Gonzalez v. Arthur Calderon, the plaintiff Jesse Gonzalez filed a status report updating the court on the current state of the litigation. While specific details of the report are not provided, status reports typically inform the court about progress in discovery, settlement discussions

Central District of California

Frank Rocha has initiated a civil lawsuit against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), identified by docket number 24-cv-07054. The case involves procedural activities such as setting or resetting deadlines and hearings, indicating ongoing litigation management but without detailed substantive allegations

Central District of California

Tyrell Ainsworth has filed a civil lawsuit against Correctional Officer David Fores, alleging misconduct or violations related to Ainsworth's treatment while in custody. The case docket number is 24-cv-04029, though the specific court is not identified. The litigation involves a memorandum of points and authorities

Central District of California

In the civil case Gerald J. Wilson v. C. Geiwitz, docket number 24-cv-04104, the court issued an order addressing procedural or substantive matters related to the litigation. While specific details of the order are not provided, such orders typically resolve motions, clarify case management issues, or address

Western District of Washington

In the case 3:23-cv-05273 Wolcott v. Instant Brands Inc, the plaintiff Wolcott has initiated legal proceedings against Instant Brands Inc. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the docket reference to a 'Set/Reset Motion Noting Date' suggests procedural activity related to scheduling or motion

Western District of Washington

The case 3:25-cv-05381 Lumumba v. Pierce County et al involves a legal dispute brought by the plaintiff, Lumumba, against Pierce County and other defendants. The docket entry referenced is a minute order setting trial and pretrial dates, indicating that the case has progressed to the stage where scheduling for trial

Western District of Washington

In the case 2:25-cv-01656 Hauck v. Merck Animal Health USA - Home Again, the plaintiff Hauck has filed a response to a motion submitted by the defendant Merck Animal Health USA. The case involves a dispute related to the Home Again product line, which is associated with animal health and identification services. The

Western District of Washington

The case 3:26-cv-05351 Forslin v. Rentokil North America Inc et al involves a procedural motion wherein a party has filed an application for leave to appear pro hac vice, seeking permission for an out-of-state attorney to participate in the litigation. The underlying dispute details are not provided, but the motion

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:24-cv-09429 Flycatcher Corp. Ltd. et al v. Affable Avenue LLC et al, the plaintiffs, Flycatcher Corp. Ltd. and others, have initiated litigation against defendants Affable Avenue LLC and associated parties. The case is currently in the pre-conference stage, indicating that the parties are preparing for

Southern District of New York

In the case Mannings v. Zito et al, docket number 25-cv-01672, the parties are engaged in discovery proceedings. The case involves the exchange of evidence and information relevant to the claims and defenses asserted. The discovery phase is critical for both sides to gather facts, documents, and testimony to support

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:25-cv-09592 E.M.M. v. Almodovar et al, the plaintiff E.M.M. has filed a Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of a Motion, indicating ongoing litigation between the parties. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the filing suggests that the plaintiff is responding to opposition arguments

Southern District of New York

The case 1:25-cv-06531 Porfirio Candia et al v. M & Y Catering Inc. involves plaintiffs Porfirio Candia and others bringing a legal action against M & Y Catering Inc. The docket entry referenced is an order on a motion for conference, indicating procedural steps in the litigation process. Specific details about the

Southern District of New York

The case 1:22-cv-10690 involves The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, Inc. as the plaintiff and The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research as the defendant. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the case appears to involve a legal disagreement likely related to research, intellectual

Southern District of New York

In the case Winder v. Oscar Health, Inc. et al, the plaintiff has filed a motion supported by a memorandum of law, indicating ongoing litigation involving Oscar Health, Inc. The specifics of the dispute are not detailed in the available information, but the filing suggests a contested legal issue requiring judicial