Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

The case of USA v. Hardial et al appears to be a criminal matter involving multiple defendants. While specific details of the charges or allegations are not provided, the designation 'cr' in the docket number indicates a criminal proceeding. The notice of hearing suggests that the court has scheduled a procedural or

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:25-cv-07100 Corey Sipkin Photography LLC v. TGD Marketing Limited, the plaintiff, Corey Sipkin Photography LLC, initiated legal action against TGD Marketing Limited. The docket includes an Order to Show Cause, indicating that the court has requested one party to appear and explain or justify certain

Southern District of New York

The case Gulino, et al v. Board of Education, et al, docket number 96-cv-08414, involved plaintiffs challenging actions taken by the Board of Education. The litigation spanned several years and addressed issues related to educational policies and practices. The referenced document is an Order of Dismissal, indicating

Southern District of New York

The case 7:23-cv-04907 Magliocco v. Warden John/Jane Doe involves a plaintiff, Magliocco, filing a legal action against the warden(s) identified as John or Jane Doe. The docket indicates the filing of a letter, which may pertain to procedural or substantive matters within the case. Specific details about the nature of

Southern District of New York

The case titled IN RE NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION, docket number 23-cv-10488, involves a securities class action lawsuit against National Instruments Corporation. The litigation centers on allegations that the company made materially false or misleading statements that affected investors.

Southern District of New York

The case 1:24-cv-09792 Miranda v. York Hill Housing, Inc. et al involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Miranda, and the defendants, York Hill Housing, Inc. and others. While specific details of the claims are not provided, the case appears to concern issues related to housing or landlord-tenant relations

Southern District of New York

The case 1:15-cv-10154 involves Focus Products Group International, LLC and other plaintiffs filing a lawsuit against Kartri Sales Company, Inc. While specific factual details of the dispute are not provided, the docket entry references a Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement, which is a procedural filing disclosing

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:24-cv-04337 Regal Games LLC v. SellerX Eight GmbH et al, the plaintiff, Regal Games LLC, has initiated legal proceedings against SellerX Eight GmbH and other defendants. The docket includes a notice regarding a pro hac vice motion, indicating that an attorney not admitted to the court's jurisdiction has

Southern District of New York

In the case of Goldman v. Weisman et al, docket number 24-cv-07097, the court issued a memorandum and opinion addressing the legal disputes between the plaintiff, Goldman, and the defendants, Weisman and others. The opinion provides the court's analysis and ruling on the motions or claims presented, clarifying the

Southern District of New York

In the case of Santiago v. Benhoussa et al, docket number 24-cv-09193, the court issued an order regarding a motion for discovery. The order addresses the parties' requests and obligations related to the exchange of evidence and information pertinent to the litigation. Discovery motions typically involve disputes over

Southern District of New York

In the case of USA v. CHARLES, the court addressed issues related to the revocation of supervised release. The proceeding involved an interim hearing to determine whether the defendant, CHARLES, violated the terms of his supervised release.

Southern District of New York

The case 1:23-cv-11125 Glencore Ltd. et al v. Louis Dreyfus Company B.V. et al involves a legal dispute between two major commodity trading companies. The matter is currently in the early stages, as indicated by a recent conference documented in the court docket. Specific details about the claims or defenses have not

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:21-cv-05392 One Step Up, Ltd. v. Empire Apparel LLC et al, the parties are engaged in litigation concerning disputes between One Step Up, Ltd. and Empire Apparel LLC along with other defendants. The docket includes a scheduling order that outlines the timeline for pretrial proceedings, discovery

Southern District of New York

The case titled Unifor, Inc. v. Markbreit et al, docket number 25-cv-09292, is currently in the stage of a settlement conference. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the involvement of Unifor, Inc., a labor union, suggests the matter may pertain to labor relations or employment issues. The

Southern District of New York

The case titled USA v. Paulino, docket number 23-cr-00501, involves a motion to postpone sentencing. The defendant, Paulino, is involved in federal criminal proceedings, and the request to delay sentencing suggests ongoing considerations that may impact the timing or conditions of the final judgment.

Southern District of New York

The case titled Ciccone v. Pabon et al, docket number 25-cv-01669, involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff Ciccone and defendants Pabon and others. The available document is a letter filed in the case, but specific details about the nature of the claims or the procedural posture are not provided. Without

Southern District of New York

In the case 1:25-cv-08282, 3 Spinners Technology LLC filed a lawsuit against AppStirr LLC. The court issued an Order to Show Cause, which typically requires a party to appear and explain or justify why a certain action should or should not be taken. Specific details regarding the underlying dispute or claims have not

Southern District of New York

The case titled In Re Amazon.com, Inc. eBook Antitrust Litigation, docket number 21-cv-00351, involves allegations against Amazon.com, Inc. concerning antitrust issues related to its eBook business. Plaintiffs claim that Amazon engaged in anti-competitive practices that may have harmed competition and consumers in the

Central District of California

The case titled The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut v. Esau Garcia, docket number 2:25-cv-00966, involves a dispute between an insurance company and an individual. The primary procedural development noted is a motion to extend the discovery cut-off date, indicating ongoing pretrial discovery issues. The

Central District of California

In the case titled United States of America v. Approximately 37,035 Bottles of Alcohol Seized from The Liquor Spot et al, the government initiated legal action concerning a large quantity of alcohol seized from a business known as The Liquor Spot. The case involves the seizure and potential forfeiture of these