Reply to Response to Motion is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. A Motion was filed. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents
Browse Cases
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
49501 cases tracked · 49501 currently active
Showing 20 of 49501 matching cases
Objection is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source documents are linked to the case.
Memorandum in Opposition to Motion is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. A Motion was filed. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine will update the summary as new court events, attorney appearances, and source
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Jeannice W. Appenteng. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (ee, ) is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final
NOTICE OF NON-CONSENT Consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge under DUCivR 72-3 has not been obtained. Case randomly assigned to Judge Robert J. Shelby and Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg. Magistrate Judge is automatically referred under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Daphne A. Oberg no longer
/Verification of Current and Future Income re 6 Order, filed by David D Crossett. (jwt) (Entered: 04/02/2026) is tracked by Juryvine as a civil case. The court issued an order. This page is held in watch mode until richer filings, parties, rulings, or media coverage provide enough context for deeper analysis. Juryvine
Kingman v. Atlantis Submarines Hawaii LLC is a case where the plaintiff, Kingman, sued the defendant, Atlantis Submarines Hawaii LLC, for damages. The case is currently pending and the court has not made any rulings yet.
The case of State ex rel. Howard v. Chief Inspectors Office is an appellate matter with an unknown docket number. The case involves a dispute over the authority of the Chief Inspectors Office. The case is currently pending in an unknown court.
This case involves a dispute between Lumpkin and Nutmeg State Financial Credit Union. The court's opinion is not available, and the case details are unknown. The case is currently pending, and no further information is available.
This case involves a dispute between Mutual Security Credit Union and Hardy. The court's opinion is not available, and the case details are unknown. The case is currently pending, and no further information is available.
Jerami David Potts v. David P. Steiner US Postal Service Postmaster is a case where the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging various claims. the court's decision is not available in the provided information.
Justin Follett v. Philadelphia Department of Prisons CFCF is a case where the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging various claims. Unfortunately, the court's decision is not available in the provided information.
R-Veejay Deosaran v. Brett A. Perkins et al. is a case where the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants, alleging various claims. Unfortunately, the court's decision is not available in the provided information.
Maxius Pierre Waite v. Warden Leon County Detention Facility is a case where the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant, alleging various claims. the court's decision is not available in the provided information.
Patrick Ginn v. Camille Hayes, Alabama DHR, and Supervisor Kendra Smith is a case where the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants, alleging various claims. the court's decision is not available in the provided information, and the case details are currently unknown due to the lack of information provided.
Alonzo Criss, Mary Criss, and Alissa Hoag v. Tony Evers and Jenna Gill Morgan is a case where the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the defendants, alleging various claims. The court's decision is not available in the provided information.
This case of J. Jeffers Co. LLC v. City of Jackson is not available for summary due to the lack of information provided. The court and docket number are unknown, making it impossible to provide a summary or risk assessment.
Unfortunately, there is not enough information available to provide a summary for this case. The title of the case is /opinion/10846868/santana-v-studebaker-health-care-center/, but the court and docket information are unknown.
A civil case involved Chavez v Chavez. The details of the case are not available, but it is clear that the case is a civil matter between two private parties. Further information is needed to determine the specifics of the case and the potential risks involved. This case highlights the importance of clear information