civil-litigation court-opinion

Court issues opinion in civil case Deosaran v. Perkins et al with multiple defendants

Active Opinion issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

R-Veejay Deosaran v. Brett A. Perkins et al. is a case where the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants, alleging various claims. Unfortunately, the court's decision is not available in the provided information.

Latest development

R Veejay Deosaran v. Brett a Perkins ET AL: Opinion Issued

Opinion · April 23, 2026

The court issued a written opinion.

Key Issues

  • Unknown court decision
  • Unspecified claims
  • Lack of information
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

Court not identified

Awaiting court metadata

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Opinion issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

R Veejay Deosaran v. Brett a Perkins ET AL: Opinion Issued

Opinion · Apr 23, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff

2 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.

The newest docket activity we have is a opinion dated April 23, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Brett a Perkins, R Veejay Deosaran.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
menu_book
Opinion April 23, 2026

R Veejay Deosaran v. Brett a Perkins ET AL: Opinion Issued

The court issued a written opinion.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

2 hours, 33 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.