Browse Cases

District of New Jersey

The United States of America pursues a criminal case against Paparatto in the District of New Jersey. Recent docket activity focuses on setting and resetting motions, deadlines, and hearings, reflecting ongoing pretrial management.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey scheduled motions and hearings in Huertas et al v. Bayer U.S. LLC. The case involves active litigation with deadlines for motions and report and recommendation filings, suggesting ongoing dispute resolution.

District of New Jersey

Borowski et al. filed a civil lawsuit against the Township of Edison and others in the District of New Jersey. Recent procedural activity involves managing case flags and deadlines, indicating early or administrative stages of litigation.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey issued an order in Pullman v. Passaic County, New Jersey. The order’s content and case details remain undisclosed, limiting insight into the litigation’s nature or status.

District of New Jersey

Maxwell filed a civil lawsuit against the United States of America in the District of New Jersey. The case is in early stages with no disclosed claims or procedural developments.

District of New Jersey

An application was filed in the District of New Jersey seeking a multi-court exemption from Judicial Conference Electronic Public Access fees. The request aims to reduce or waive costs for electronic access to court records across jurisdictions.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey court issued an order in Rimbert v. County of Essex, an ongoing civil case. Details of the order and claims remain unspecified, but the litigation involves the County of Essex as a defendant.

District of New Jersey

The court executed a summons on the New Jersey Department of Children and Families in McDaniel EL et al v. New Jersey Department of Children and Families. This formal notification compels the defendants to respond to the civil complaint.

District of New Jersey

In Lall v. United States of America, mail related to the civil case was returned, disrupting communication between parties and the court. This procedural issue risks delaying case progress in the District of New Jersey.

District of New Jersey

Vargas filed a motion for reconsideration against the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families in the District of New Jersey. The motion challenges prior rulings in a civil case involving family or administrative law issues.

Central District of California

The Central District of California docket shows opposition to a motion in McCarden v. Waller et al, docket number 24-cv-10676. The opposition filing signals contested procedural or substantive issues between the parties in this civil case.

Central District of California

The Central District of California granted an extension of time in Discos Linda LLC et al v. Lombardo Figuerea Acosta et al, docket number 25-cv-03757. The extension affects filing deadlines amid ongoing procedural activity in this civil case.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey multidistrict litigation (MDL) involving Apple Inc. continues, docket number 24-md-03113. The MDL addresses antitrust claims related to the smartphone market, consolidating numerous cases for coordinated management.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey docket records Hirsch's answer to a crossclaim in Hirsch v. Colliers Engineering & Design, docket number 25-cv-15974. The case involves contested claims typical of engineering and design sector disputes.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey docket shows ongoing civil dispute in Klemm v. MGM Resorts International, docket number 22-cv-07363. The case involves unresolved claims against MGM Resorts, with potential related or consolidated proceedings pending.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey docket reflects procedural activity in Brown v. Kimmerle Group Management Corp., docket number 25-cv-15234. The filings focus on procedural matters without substantive updates on claims or defenses.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey considered a pro hac vice motion in Shanghai Qianzhuo Network Technology Co. v. Lufranco, docket number 25-cv-15740. The motion concerns allowing out-of-state counsel to participate in the case, affecting representation arrangements.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey is overseeing a joint discovery plan in Bakuradze v. Cook et al, docket number 25-cv-18123. The case remains in the discovery phase, with parties coordinating evidence gathering under court supervision.

District of New Jersey

The District of New Jersey issued a procedural order in the criminal case Buitimea v. West et al, docket number 25-cv-03114. The order addresses motions affecting the case's procedural progress and reflects ongoing judicial management of litigation steps.

District of New Jersey

Kumar et al filed a reply brief in a motion against Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha in the District of New Jersey. The reply addresses opposition to a motion, indicating ongoing contested litigation. The case remains active with procedural disputes.