2:24-cv-10676 Khrista McCarden v. Marshall W. Waller et al
Case Summary
This civil case features Khrista McCarden as plaintiff against Marshall W. Waller and others. The docket reflects opposition to a motion, indicating contested issues between the parties. The specifics of the motion and the underlying claims are not detailed, but the filing suggests active dispute over procedural or substantive matters. The case is in a stage where motions are being actively litigated, which may influence the direction and timing of the case. The opposition filing demonstrates engagement by the parties in shaping the court's decisions on pending issues.
Stage
Motion practice
Timeline
1 event
Coverage
1 article
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Opposition to motion
- • Civil dispute
- • Active litigation
- • Procedural contest
Case Timeline
1 event2:24-cv-10676 Khrista McCarden v. Marshall W. Waller et al
In the case of Khrista McCarden versus Marshall W. Waller and others, a party filed a formal response opposing a previously submitted motion. This opposition means they disagree with the request made and want the court to deny it. Such exchanges are crucial as they help the judge understand both sides before making a decision.