Chief Justice John Roberts expressed concern about the Supreme Court's public perception as political. He acknowledged declining public approval ratings for the court. Roberts' remarks come amid increased scrutiny of the court's conservative majority.
Browse Cases
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
41481 cases tracked · 41481 currently active
Showing 20 of 41481 matching cases
Maryland's highest court recently restricted the use of public nuisance claims in two decisions. These rulings have immediate consequences for Baltimore's opioid litigation, which relied on such claims against drug companies. The Maryland Supreme Court's decisions will also affect other types of widespread harm cases.
WASHINGTON — A federal court ruled Thursday against the new global tariffs that President Donald Trump imposed after a stinging loss at the Supreme Court. A split three-judge panel of the Court of International Trade in New York found the 10% global tariffs were illegal after small businesses sued. The court ruled 2-1
The Louisiana Legislature started considering yet another set of congressional district maps, planning to identify one that is clearly constitutional, a process aided by the recent U.S. The high court ruled that it’s not OK to consider race and racial proportionality as a factor, but it’s perfectly fine to draw maps —
Southern District of Florida
Civil case in S.D. Fla. currently marked active.
A California immigration judge is suing the Department of Justice (DOJ), alleging she was fired due to her political affiliation and gender. Kyra Lilien claims she was terminated because she is a registered Democrat and associated with immigrant-rights groups. Lilien alleges the firing by the Trump administration was
A class action lawsuit accuses Lucky Strike Entertainment of violating federal antitrust laws. The suit was filed by avid bowlers who allege anticompetitive practices by the entertainment chain. Reporter Katya Schwenk of The Lever provided details on the case. The lawsuit claims Lucky Strike engaged in actions that
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief District Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (JKK) (Entered: 05/05/2026)
Northern District of California
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 3
Northern District of Illinois
Lemelle v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al is a civil case with a current summary of no information available. The case was filed in 2026 with docket number 26-cv-04694. The court has not been specified.
Northern District of Illinois
Avery v. City Of Chicago, et al is a civil case with a docket number of 25-cv-04342. The current summary is an extension of time for 76 days. The case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Avery, and the defendants, City Of Chicago, et al. The exact nature of the dispute is not specified in the provided
Central District of California
Jordan v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al is a civil case with an unknown court. The current docket number is 26-cv-04543. The case is still ongoing. Further information is needed to determine the key issues and potential outcomes.
District of Columbia
MONTES MONTES v. BLANCHE et al is a civil case filed in the District of Columbia. The court has granted leave for an amicus brief to be filed. This means a third party, not directly involved in the litigation, will submit arguments to assist the court.
Northern District of California
The plaintiff, C., filed an amended complaint against Uber Technologies Inc and others in the case 26-cv-03301. The complaint alleges violations of state law. The court has not yet ruled on the complaint. The amended complaint provides additional details and evidence to support the plaintiff's claims.
President Donald Trump’s administration has been granted permission to continue construction of a $400 million ballroom on the site of the White House’s demolished East Wing. A hearing has been scheduled for June to review a Washington judge’s order halting the project.
Eastern District of Texas
The plaintiff has secured a summary judgment in their favor against Bentley Motors, Inc., dismissing the remaining claims and resolving the case without trial.
Central District of California
In this civil lawsuit, Wahlquist is objecting to a report and recommendations presented by the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. The objection may raise questions about the methodology, findings, or conclusions of the report, which could impact the outcome of the case.
Northern District of California
USA v. Alsadun et al is a criminal case before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, with a protective order in place.
District of New Jersey
This civil case, 9:26-cv-00215, involves Caballero Moises v. Sanchez et al. The court has issued an Alter Judgment, indicating a significant procedural or substantive change in the case's outcome.
Central District of California
JKN Universe, LLC filed a civil lawsuit against Harfouch under docket 26-cv-00316. No further details or case activity summaries are available at this time, leaving the nature of the dispute and claims unclear. The case appears to be in early stages or lacks publicly available updates.