Northern District of California
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 2
Explore the full federal litigation docket tracked by Juryvine. Our database covers filings across all 94 federal district courts, 13 circuit courts of appeals, and the Supreme Court — kept current from primary court records. Filter by case type, status, or court level to find the cases that matter to your practice.
41509 cases tracked · 41509 currently active
Showing 20 of 33189 matching cases
Northern District of California
Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures ( 2
Northern District of California
Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active.
Northern District of California
Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active.
Northern District of California
Civil case in N.D. Cal. currently marked active.
Southern District of Florida
Civil case in S.D. Fla. currently marked active.
Southern District of Florida
Civil case in S.D. Fla. currently marked active.
Southern District of New York
Civil case in S.D.N.Y. currently marked active.
District of Colorado
A minute order has been filed in the case USA v. 121 Ash Road, Basalt, Colorado et al. Minute orders typically record court proceedings or decisions. This filing indicates active court management of the case.
Southern District of New York
An AO 121 Form Copyright was filed in Mapes v. Criteo Corp. et al. This filing relates to copyright claims within the lawsuit. The form is used for specific legal declarations.
Central District of California
A settlement conference has been scheduled in Rogelio Trejo v. Michael Brandon Freeman et al. This indicates the parties are attempting to resolve the dispute outside of a trial. The conference aims to help an agreement.
Southern District of New York
Sealed documents have been filed in the criminal case USA v. Abdalla et al. The contents of these filings are not publicly accessible. This often occurs in cases involving sensitive information or ongoing investigations.
Southern District of New York
Guerrero v. GoPuff has had a status report filed. This indicates the case is ongoing and parties are providing updates on proceedings. The report likely details recent actions or upcoming steps.
Southern District of New York
Fonville v. Heightened Security Incorporated et al is a civil case. No summary or specific court details are available. The case appears to be in its early stages or lacks public filings.
Southern District of New York
No information is currently available for the case Stock v. Fiera Capital Inc. This lack of detail prevents an assessment of the case's nature or status.
Southern District of New York
Judgment has been entered in Sandoval-Abzun v. Genalo, with the clerk filing the official entry. This signifies the final decision in the case. The case is now closed.
Southern District of New York
Morin v. Gulluni et al involves a letter motion filed by one of the parties. The specific nature of this motion is not detailed. Such motions often address procedural matters or requests for court action.
Southern District of New York
Carrasco v. Saravi, MD et al has concluded with a stipulation of voluntary dismissal. This means the parties have agreed to end the lawsuit. The case was filed in 2025.
District of Colorado
A memorandum has been filed in the case of Eloph v. Hos Bros Construction Inc. This document likely contains legal arguments or findings from the court. Its contents will shape the ongoing proceedings.
District of Colorado
An attorney has filed a request to withdraw from representing a party in Jana Groller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al. This action may signal a change in legal strategy or potential settlement discussions.
Central District of California
Great American Risk Solutions Surplus Lines Insurance Company sued A1 Specialized, Inc. The court scheduled a telephone conference for this civil matter. The purpose of the conference is likely to discuss case progress or upcoming deadlines.