Browse Cases

Northern District of California

In Schwartz v. Mount Sinai Morningside et al, docket 25-cv-10125, the Northern District of California court deleted a document from the case record. The reasons and nature of the document were not disclosed in the notice.

Northern District of California

Emily A. Done initiated a civil lawsuit against Lululemon USA Inc. and others in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-03060. The court issued an initial order confirming the case commencement, but the complaint's substance remains undisclosed.

Northern District of California

Plaintiff Richter filed suit against Everlast Worldwide, Inc. and other defendants in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-09827. The complaint and claims remain undisclosed, but the case has officially commenced with court filings.

Northern District of California

Thomas Maciejewski sued Unifin, Inc. in the Northern District of California under docket 25-cv-09261. The court assigned a panel mediator to help alternative dispute resolution, signaling an attempt to settle the dispute outside of litigation.

Northern District of California

A notice was filed in the civil case Murman et al v. Murman, docket 24-cv-01439 in the Northern District of California. The notice's content is not detailed in the docket. The case remains active with procedural filings, but no substantive updates are publicly available at this time.

Northern District of California

Innovative Sports Management and After Bar And Grill reached a stipulation in a civil case in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-04993. The parties agreed on procedural matters without submitting a proposed order. The stipulation likely resolves some disputes or sets terms for case management

Central District of California

The United States filed a civil suit against Kool Living, Inc. and related entities in the Central District of California, docket 24-cv-07632. The case involves government claims, with a termination motion recently filed. The litigation appears to be progressing toward resolution or dismissal, but specific allegations

Central District of California

In USA v. Medel, docket 11-cr-00531 in the Central District of California, the government seeks revocation of the defendant's probation or supervised release. The court held a preliminary revocation hearing to review the defendant's compliance. This federal criminal case involves potential consequences including

Northern District of California

The Shumate v. Bonta case opened in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-10166. The docket indicates the start of proceedings without substantive details on claims or issues. The litigation is at an initial stage with no public information on the nature of the dispute or parties' positions.

Northern District of California

Mayra Manzano filed a civil lawsuit against POM Medical, LLC and others in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-00993. The complaint seeks damages or other relief related to alleged wrongdoing by the defendants. The case is progressing through initial litigation stages with status reports filed. Specific

Northern District of California

Defendant Gonzalez and others filed a motion for an extension of time to respond in a civil case in the Northern District of California, docket 24-cv-03859. The motion cites the need for further investigation and the complexity of the case as reasons for additional time. The court's decision on the extension will

Northern District of California

United Community Banks, Inc. initiated a civil lawsuit against Levy in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-10047. The case likely involves banking or financial disputes, but the docket provides no specific facts or claims. The litigation is in its early phase with no public details on allegations or

Northern District of California

Isaac Davidson-Gesser filed a civil suit against Aequor Healthcare Services, LLC and others in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-00760. The docket reflects procedural activity such as setting deadlines and hearings, but no substantive allegations or claims are publicly available. The case remains in

Northern District of California

The court clerk in Rory OCallaghan v. Superior Court of California County of Orange et al, docket 25-cv-01447, has been ordered to enter default against the defendants. This step follows the defendants' failure to respond or appear within the required timeframe, allowing the plaintiff to pursue a default judgment or

Northern District of California

Parties in La Motte v. others submitted a stipulation and proposed order in the Northern District of California. The filing sets agreed terms and procedural next steps, reflecting cooperation on case management without revealing substantive dispute details.

Northern District of California

Entrepreneur Media, LLC filed a motion seeking miscellaneous relief against Meta Platforms, Inc. in the Northern District of California. The filing suggests ongoing dispute resolution efforts but lacks details on the nature of the relief sought or underlying claims.

Northern District of California

The United States filed a motion seeking additional relief in the Lopez Baltazar case in the Northern District of California. The motion's specifics are not detailed, but it indicates the government is pursuing further remedies in this matter.

Northern District of California

Plaintiff Ramirez filed a motion to terminate the civil case against Monterey County Jail and Mental Health in the Northern District of California. The motion argues the case lacks merit or has been resolved, signaling a potential end to litigation or dismissal.

Northern District of California

An administrative motion was filed under Civil Local Rule 7-11 in the In re Google RTB Consumer Privacy Litigation in the Northern District of California. The motion addresses procedural issues, reflecting ongoing case management in this complex privacy litigation.

Northern District of California

Parties in Tull v. Jenkins submitted a stipulation and proposed order in the Northern District of California. The filing outlines agreed procedural steps and mutual agreements, helping the next phase of litigation without revealing substantive dispute details.