Browse Cases

Northern District of California

The Shumate v. Bonta case opened in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-10166. The docket indicates the start of proceedings without substantive details on claims or issues. The litigation is at an initial stage with no public information on the nature of the dispute or parties' positions.

Northern District of California

Mayra Manzano filed a civil lawsuit against POM Medical, LLC and others in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-00993. The complaint seeks damages or other relief related to alleged wrongdoing by the defendants. The case is progressing through initial litigation stages with status reports filed. Specific

Northern District of California

Defendant Gonzalez and others filed a motion for an extension of time to respond in a civil case in the Northern District of California, docket 24-cv-03859. The motion cites the need for further investigation and the complexity of the case as reasons for additional time. The court's decision on the extension will

Northern District of California

United Community Banks, Inc. initiated a civil lawsuit against Levy in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-10047. The case likely involves banking or financial disputes, but the docket provides no specific facts or claims. The litigation is in its early phase with no public details on allegations or

Northern District of California

Isaac Davidson-Gesser filed a civil suit against Aequor Healthcare Services, LLC and others in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-00760. The docket reflects procedural activity such as setting deadlines and hearings, but no substantive allegations or claims are publicly available. The case remains in

Northern District of California

The court clerk in Rory OCallaghan v. Superior Court of California County of Orange et al, docket 25-cv-01447, has been ordered to enter default against the defendants. This step follows the defendants' failure to respond or appear within the required timeframe, allowing the plaintiff to pursue a default judgment or

Northern District of California

Parties in La Motte v. others submitted a stipulation and proposed order in the Northern District of California. The filing sets agreed terms and procedural next steps, reflecting cooperation on case management without revealing substantive dispute details.

Northern District of California

Entrepreneur Media, LLC filed a motion seeking miscellaneous relief against Meta Platforms, Inc. in the Northern District of California. The filing suggests ongoing dispute resolution efforts but lacks details on the nature of the relief sought or underlying claims.

Northern District of California

The United States filed a motion seeking additional relief in the Lopez Baltazar case in the Northern District of California. The motion's specifics are not detailed, but it indicates the government is pursuing further remedies in this matter.

Northern District of California

Plaintiff Ramirez filed a motion to terminate the civil case against Monterey County Jail and Mental Health in the Northern District of California. The motion argues the case lacks merit or has been resolved, signaling a potential end to litigation or dismissal.

Northern District of California

An administrative motion was filed under Civil Local Rule 7-11 in the In re Google RTB Consumer Privacy Litigation in the Northern District of California. The motion addresses procedural issues, reflecting ongoing case management in this complex privacy litigation.

Northern District of California

Parties in Tull v. Jenkins submitted a stipulation and proposed order in the Northern District of California. The filing outlines agreed procedural steps and mutual agreements, helping the next phase of litigation without revealing substantive dispute details.

Northern District of California

The court granted an extension for filing responses or replies in Norris v. Madame Rouge Corporation in the Northern District of California. This procedural order indicates ongoing litigation activity but does not reveal details about the underlying dispute or claims.

Northern District of California

FEUMBA v. QUIGLEY in the Northern District of California reached a procedural milestone with the filing of a status report. The report likely updates the court on case progress, pending motions, or settlement talks, but no substantive details about claims or defenses are currently available.

Northern District of California

Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company changed counsel in its suit against Eagle Contractors, Inc. in the Northern District of California. The case likely involves claims related to labor agreements or contributions to trust funds, but the recent activity centers on legal representation

Northern District of California

Plaintiffs Brown and others filed an administrative motion under Civil Local Rule 7-11 in litigation against Google LLC. The motion addresses procedural or administrative issues in the case pending in the Northern District of California. The docket number is 20-cv-03664.

Northern District of California

Plaintiffs Anderson and others filed a status report in their civil suit against the City and County of San Francisco in the Northern District of California. The report provides an update on the litigation's progress and recent developments. The case number is 20-cv-01149.

Northern District of California

A status report was filed in the civil litigation Doe v. Stanford Federal Credit Union in the Northern District of California. The report updates the court on case developments, pending matters, and actions taken by the parties. The docket number is 25-cv-07241.

Northern District of California

Plaintiff Pifferini filed a motion to alter judgment in a civil case against the City of Eureka in the Northern District of California. The motion seeks to modify or overturn a prior judgment, potentially based on new evidence or legal arguments. The case is docketed as 24-cv-09191.

Central District of California

The United States Court of Appeals issued a memorandum in the Darren Norman v. C. Wu civil case in the Central District of California. This memorandum marks a procedural milestone, possibly addressing appellate issues or clarifying legal positions. The case number is 17-cv-05299.