Browse Cases

Southern District of New York

SkinnyBond Inc. v. Treat Medspa LLC was assigned in the Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-07805. The notice confirms the case's entry into the court's docket and identifies the assigned judge.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York assigned Baez v. Pizza On Stone LLC, docket 21-cv-09714, to a judge. This procedural notice confirms the case's active status and identifies the presiding judicial officer.

Southern District of New York

The United States Court of Appeals mandate was transmitted to the district judge in Dunbar v. Zuckerberg, docket 25-cv-01960 in the Southern District of New York. This action follows the appellate court's final decision, directing the district court to proceed accordingly.

Southern District of New York

An appeal was filed in Baly v. Certificate of Appeals Supreme Court of New York, docket 22-cv-05812 in the Southern District of New York. The appeal challenges a prior decision, moving the dispute into appellate review.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York assigned the Talley v. Banks case under docket 24-cv-02094. This procedural step establishes the presiding judge and moves the case into active status for further proceedings.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York judge issued an order on the motion to dismiss in The Resource Group International v. Chishti, docket number 23-cv-01760. The order addresses the defendant's challenge to the plaintiff's claims, setting the stage for further litigation or potential dismissal of certain counts.

Southern District of New York

A proposed stipulation and order was filed in Libit v. United States Military Academy, docket 23-cv-00845 in the Southern District of New York. The document likely outlines agreed terms between parties for court approval. This procedural step can resolve disputes or set case management parameters without contested

Southern District of New York

An affirmation in support was filed in the criminal case USA v. Ahmed, docket 25-mj-03791, in the Southern District of New York. This non-motion filing supports a pending request or court action. The affirmation provides factual or legal justification to assist the court's decision-making.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York issued an order on a motion to dismiss in Deidan v. Santander US Capital Markets, docket 25-cv-04819. The order resolves whether the plaintiff's claims survive the defendant's challenge. This ruling determines if the case proceeds or ends at the pleading stage.

Southern District of New York

In the criminal case USA v. Gjidija, docket 25-cr-00327, the Southern District of New York docketed a letter motion. This filing likely pertains to a procedural or substantive request by one party. The letter motion may seek court action or clarification on an issue pending in the criminal prosecution.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York filed a memorandum and opinion in Rhodes v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, docket 25-cv-06269. The opinion resolves a substantive legal issue or motion, providing the court's reasoning and ruling. This document clarifies the legal posture and may affect the case's trajectory.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York issued a report and recommendations in Cordero v. City University of New York, docket 25-cv-07354. The report likely addresses dispositive motions or procedural issues and provides the magistrate judge's findings for the district judge's review. This step guides the court's

Southern District of New York

Richmond Global Compass Fund v. Novartis International AG was assigned to a judge in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-06490. This procedural event establishes the judicial framework for the case. The court will now oversee all pretrial and trial activities, including motions and discovery disputes.

Southern District of New York

Rodriguez v. 605 West 42nd Owner LLC was assigned to a judge in the Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-08362. The case assignment marks the initiation of judicial oversight and case management. This procedural step enables the court to schedule hearings, manage discovery, and move the litigation forward.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York docket 22-cv-10777 reflects a transfer of probation or supervised release in Ruiz v. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank. This transfer indicates a change in the jurisdiction responsible for supervising the defendant's probation terms. The procedural update affects the

Southern District of New York

The United States Court of Appeals issued its mandate in Summer Crest LLC v. Town of Monroe, concluding appellate review in the Southern District of New York case 23-cv-06048. This action signals the end of the appellate process and the return of the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with

Northern District of California

The court recorded a disbursement of funds in Stevenson v. Allstate Insurance in the Northern District of California, docket 15-cv-04788. This filing reflects payment distribution, likely related to settlement or judgment proceeds. It signals progress toward final resolution of financial claims.

Northern District of California

The civil case Trustees v. Texas State Insulation was terminated in the Northern District of California, docket 24-cv-03586. Case termination indicates resolution by dismissal, settlement, or judgment. This ends active litigation in the district court.

Northern District of California

A case management statement was filed in Cerecedes v. Houston Casualty in the Northern District of California, docket 24-cv-06558. This document outlines the parties' views on scheduling, discovery, and trial preparation. It guides the court's management of the civil litigation.

Southern District of Florida

The clerk entered default against Solar4America Technology in a lawsuit filed by Salt Energy in the Southern District of Florida, docket 25-cv-22797. Default entry occurs when a defendant fails to respond to a complaint, exposing them to liability and potential judgment. This escalates the plaintiff's use.