Browse Cases

Northern District of California

Concerned Jewish Parents filed a lawsuit against Sequoia Union High School District in the Northern District of California. The case involves community concerns and likely challenges to school policies or actions.

District of Massachusetts

Sun Pharmaceutical submitted a status report in a patent dispute pending in the District of Massachusetts, docket 24-cv-11637. The report likely updates the court on case progress, discovery, or settlement discussions. The dispute involves intellectual property rights related to pharmaceuticals.

Eastern District of Texas

Fontenot filed an amended answer in the civil suit against Whitehouse Independent School District in the Eastern District of Texas, docket 24-cv-00450. The amended answer updates Fontenot's defenses or responses to the plaintiff's complaint. This procedural step may clarify issues or introduce new defenses.

Northern District of Illinois

The Northern District of Illinois granted Rodriguez an extension of time in the civil case docketed as 22-cv-06141. This procedural order allows additional time for Rodriguez to meet a court deadline, likely related to filing documents or responding to motions. The extension reflects the court's discretion to

Southern District of New York

SkinnyBond Inc. v. Treat Medspa LLC was assigned in the Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-07805. The notice confirms the case's entry into the court's docket and identifies the assigned judge.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York assigned Baez v. Pizza On Stone LLC, docket 21-cv-09714, to a judge. This procedural notice confirms the case's active status and identifies the presiding judicial officer.

Southern District of New York

The United States Court of Appeals mandate was transmitted to the district judge in Dunbar v. Zuckerberg, docket 25-cv-01960 in the Southern District of New York. This action follows the appellate court's final decision, directing the district court to proceed accordingly.

Southern District of New York

An appeal was filed in Baly v. Certificate of Appeals Supreme Court of New York, docket 22-cv-05812 in the Southern District of New York. The appeal challenges a prior decision, moving the dispute into appellate review.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York assigned the Talley v. Banks case under docket 24-cv-02094. This procedural step establishes the presiding judge and moves the case into active status for further proceedings.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York judge issued an order on the motion to dismiss in The Resource Group International v. Chishti, docket number 23-cv-01760. The order addresses the defendant's challenge to the plaintiff's claims, setting the stage for further litigation or potential dismissal of certain counts.

Southern District of New York

A proposed stipulation and order was filed in Libit v. United States Military Academy, docket 23-cv-00845 in the Southern District of New York. The document likely outlines agreed terms between parties for court approval. This procedural step can resolve disputes or set case management parameters without contested

Southern District of New York

An affirmation in support was filed in the criminal case USA v. Ahmed, docket 25-mj-03791, in the Southern District of New York. This non-motion filing supports a pending request or court action. The affirmation provides factual or legal justification to assist the court's decision-making.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York issued an order on a motion to dismiss in Deidan v. Santander US Capital Markets, docket 25-cv-04819. The order resolves whether the plaintiff's claims survive the defendant's challenge. This ruling determines if the case proceeds or ends at the pleading stage.

Southern District of New York

In the criminal case USA v. Gjidija, docket 25-cr-00327, the Southern District of New York docketed a letter motion. This filing likely pertains to a procedural or substantive request by one party. The letter motion may seek court action or clarification on an issue pending in the criminal prosecution.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York filed a memorandum and opinion in Rhodes v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, docket 25-cv-06269. The opinion resolves a substantive legal issue or motion, providing the court's reasoning and ruling. This document clarifies the legal posture and may affect the case's trajectory.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York issued a report and recommendations in Cordero v. City University of New York, docket 25-cv-07354. The report likely addresses dispositive motions or procedural issues and provides the magistrate judge's findings for the district judge's review. This step guides the court's

Southern District of New York

Richmond Global Compass Fund v. Novartis International AG was assigned to a judge in the Southern District of New York, docket 25-cv-06490. This procedural event establishes the judicial framework for the case. The court will now oversee all pretrial and trial activities, including motions and discovery disputes.

Southern District of New York

Rodriguez v. 605 West 42nd Owner LLC was assigned to a judge in the Southern District of New York under docket 25-cv-08362. The case assignment marks the initiation of judicial oversight and case management. This procedural step enables the court to schedule hearings, manage discovery, and move the litigation forward.

Southern District of New York

The Southern District of New York docket 22-cv-10777 reflects a transfer of probation or supervised release in Ruiz v. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank. This transfer indicates a change in the jurisdiction responsible for supervising the defendant's probation terms. The procedural update affects the

Southern District of New York

The United States Court of Appeals issued its mandate in Summer Crest LLC v. Town of Monroe, concluding appellate review in the Southern District of New York case 23-cv-06048. This action signals the end of the appellate process and the return of the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with