Browse Cases

Southern District of Florida

The court set a deadline for MSC Cruises to respond in Dunne v. MSC Cruises, a civil case in the Southern District of Florida under docket 26-cv-20838. The case is in early procedural stages and may involve personal injury, contract, or consumer claims related to cruise services.

Southern District of Florida

In Admiral v. The Episcopal Church of Saint Mark the Evangelist, Inc., the court noted a pro hac vice appearance by out-of-state counsel. The case is pending in the Southern District of Florida under docket 25-cv-61957. No substantive details about claims or issues are publicly available.

District of Massachusetts

A telephone conference occurred in Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard & Nantucket Steamship Authority v. Gomes, addressing case management or procedural issues. The civil dispute involves a regional transportation authority and an individual or entity, under docket 24-cv-13040 in the District of Massachusetts.

District of Massachusetts

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts filed a notice in a civil case against Donald Trump and others, signaling active litigation involving high-profile defendants. The case, docket 25-cv-12162 in the District of Massachusetts, likely involves governmental claims on regulatory or administrative grounds.

District of Massachusetts

In Galli v. Cognism Inc., the parties filed a stipulation agreeing on certain matters to help the civil litigation. The case involves a plaintiff and a corporate defendant, possibly concerning contract or employment issues, under docket 25-cv-13153 in the District of Massachusetts.

District of Massachusetts

Counsel for both parties filed a joint statement in TB Holdings, LLC v. Town of Saugus, reflecting cooperation on procedural or substantive issues. The civil dispute likely involves property, zoning, or contractual matters under docket 25-cv-12330 in the District of Massachusetts.

District of Massachusetts

The court issued an order on a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in Poole v. Peters, allowing the plaintiff to litigate without court fees if financial hardship is proven. This procedural ruling impacts the plaintiff's ability to continue the civil case under docket 25-cv-40188 in the District of Massachusetts.

District of Massachusetts

In Lenehan v. Town of Lenox, the plaintiff filed a memorandum supporting a motion in this civil dispute. The case involves a local government defendant and likely concerns administrative or governance issues in the District of Massachusetts under docket 26-cv-30011.

District of Massachusetts

The United States government is prosecuting Jesus Abreu in a criminal case in the District of Massachusetts. Proceedings are ongoing under docket 26-cr-10101, with hearings scheduled but specific charges not publicly detailed.

Northern District of Illinois

In the case Smith v. Exchange Credit Program, the plaintiff, Smith, has filed a complaint against Exchange Credit Program alleging unspecified grievances related to credit or financial services. The complaint initiates litigation seeking remedies for the plaintiff's claims, though specific factual details and legal

Northern District of Illinois

In the case Mann v. Nissan Motor Co. Ltd et al, the plaintiff has initiated litigation against Nissan Motor Co. Ltd and potentially other defendants. The docket number 24-cv-50075 indicates a recent filing, but specific details of the claims or allegations remain sealed and are not publicly available. As a result, the

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Brown v. AGI Cargo, LLC, docket number 24-cv-07611, the court issued a judgment as reflected in document number 27. While specific details of the claims and factual background are not provided, the case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Brown, and the defendant, AGI Cargo, LLC. The judgment

Northern District of Illinois

The case titled Braun et al v. Day et al, docket number 23-cv-16856, involves plaintiffs Braun and others filing suit against defendants Day and others. The available information indicates that counsel for one party has appeared pro hac vice, suggesting involvement of out-of-state attorneys. However, specific factual

Central District of California

In the case 2:20-cv-03444 Skye Orthobiologics, LLC et al v. CTM Biomedical, LLC et al, the parties reached a settlement resolving their dispute. The litigation involved claims between Skye Orthobiologics and CTM Biomedical, likely concerning business or contractual issues given the parties' industry focus. The

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Benjamin v. Debt Freedom Attorneys, PLLC, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant law firm, Debt Freedom Attorneys, PLLC. The case reached a procedural stage where the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the grounds of failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Mansoori v. Squires et al, docket number 21-cv-05881, the court issued an order regarding a motion for an extension of time. The motion sought additional time for a party to comply with a procedural requirement or deadline in the litigation. The court's order addresses whether the extension was granted

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Saffold v. Buffalo Wild Wings et al, the court addressed a motion to dismiss filed by the defendants. The plaintiff, Saffold, brought claims against Buffalo Wild Wings and potentially other parties, alleging certain legal violations. The court's order on the motion to dismiss evaluated whether the

Central District of California

In the case 8:23-cv-02297, Peter Hildebrandt filed a lawsuit against UNUM Life Insurance Company of America. The dispute centers on issues related to the insurance policy held by Hildebrandt, with allegations likely involving denial or mishandling of benefits by UNUM. The case is currently pending, with procedural

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 1:24-cv-03767 MacNeil IP LLC et al v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc., the court addressed a motion for leave to file additional documents or pleadings. The order pertains to procedural aspects of the litigation, focusing on whether the plaintiff or defendant may amend or supplement their filings. While

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 1:24-cv-08602 Shenzhen Blue Dream Digital Technology Co., Ltd. et al v. Braun GmbH, the parties are engaged in litigation involving a motion for miscellaneous relief. The court issued an order addressing this motion, which pertains to procedural or administrative matters within the case. Specific details