Browse Cases

Southern District of Florida

Mianakian and Estes Express Lines engaged in mediation to resolve their civil dispute. The mediation report shows efforts to settle outside court, but no final agreement has been reported.

Southern District of Florida

Gonzalez served a summons on Crocs, Inc., formally starting litigation in a civil dispute. The claims against the footwear company have not been detailed, but the service marks the defendant's obligation to respond.

Southern District of Florida

Rosales Fuentes seeks miscellaneous relief in a civil case against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The relief requests suggest procedural or interim orders are at issue, though the underlying claims remain unspecified.

Southern District of Florida

Walls filed an opposition to a motion in the civil suit against the University of Miami, signaling active litigation and contested issues. The opposition likely addresses procedural or substantive challenges such as motions to dismiss or summary judgment.

Northern District of Illinois

The case titled USA v. Liggins, docket number 21-cr-00618, involves criminal proceedings against the defendant Liggins. The referenced document pertains to termination hearings, which typically address the conclusion or dismissal of certain charges or aspects of the case. While specific details of the hearings are not

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 1:24-cv-12405 Jones et al v. CCDOC Classification et al, the plaintiffs, Jones and others, have filed a lawsuit against the CCDOC Classification and related parties. The docket entry referenced involves a motion to withdraw as attorney, indicating a change in legal representation for one of the parties.

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Shenzhen Liqiu Sanhou Technology Co., Ltd v. Xiaoling Che, docket number 24-cv-11980, the court addressed a motion for leave to file certain documents or pleadings. The order pertains to procedural aspects of the litigation, specifically whether the party seeking leave met the requirements to amend or

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Dace v. Jaburek et al, the court addressed a motion for default judgment filed by the plaintiff. The motion was considered after the defendants failed to respond or otherwise defend against the claims brought by Dace. The court's order grants the default judgment, effectively ruling in favor of the

Northern District of Illinois

In the case titled Spiegel et al v. Al-Hussein Al-Hashemi et al, docket number 25-cv-09703, the plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel. The specific details of the dispute and the nature of the motion are not provided, but a motion to compel typically involves a request for the court to order the opposing party to

Northern District of Illinois

The case 1:23-cv-04875 United States of America, et al. v. KSO Metalfab Inc., et al. involves the United States government and potentially other plaintiffs bringing legal action against KSO Metalfab Inc. and additional defendants. The docket indicates a procedural motion related to leave to file a document, suggesting

Northern District of Illinois

In the case titled Crawford et al v. McDonald's USA, LLC et al, docket number 20-cv-05132, the parties requested an extension of time, as reflected in docket entry 126. The case involves plaintiffs Crawford and others against McDonald's USA, LLC and additional defendants. Specific details about the underlying claims

Northern District of Illinois

In the case 1:25-cv-15387 Okeley et al v. Alstom Transportation USA Inc., the plaintiffs filed a motion seeking leave to file certain documents or claims, which prompted the court to issue an order addressing this procedural request. The details of the motion and the court's ruling on it are part of the ongoing

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Littrice et al v. Together Chicago, docket number 25-cv-12769, the court addressed a motion for leave to file additional documents or pleadings. The order pertains to whether the plaintiffs or defendants were permitted to submit further filings beyond the original complaint or response. While specific

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Lasisi v. Ulta Beauty Cosmetics, LLC, docket number 24-cv-06220, the court issued an order regarding a motion for an extension of time. The specifics of the motion and the court's ruling are not detailed in the available information. The case involves procedural matters related to scheduling or

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Pawnee Leasing Corporation v. Mr. Munchies Food LLC et al, the court addressed a Motion in Limine, which is a pretrial request to exclude certain evidence from being presented during the trial. The order on this motion reflects the court's decisions regarding the admissibility of specific evidence that

Northern District of Illinois

In the case titled Brumfield v. Naperville Officers John Doe 1 & 2 et al, docket number 25-cv-15756, the court addressed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, which allows a plaintiff to file a lawsuit without paying standard court fees due to financial hardship. The order pertains to whether the plaintiff

Northern District of Illinois

In the case Bennett v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company, docket number 25-cv-21039, the plaintiff Bennett has initiated legal proceedings against Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. The case involves a dispute likely centered around insurance claims or benefits, as suggested by the defendant's

Northern District of Illinois

The case titled USA v. Mobley, docket number 23-cr-20288, involves a criminal proceeding against the defendant Mobley. The available document is a Notice of Reassignment of Federal Public Defender (FPD), indicating a change in legal representation for the defendant. Specific details about the charges or factual

Northern District of Illinois

The case titled USA v. Richardson, docket number 26-cr-00124, involves criminal proceedings against the defendant Richardson. While specific facts of the case are not provided, the available information indicates procedural activity related to setting or resetting deadlines and hearings. This suggests ongoing

Southern District of Florida

The court issued a report and recommendations in Betternoi, LLC v. Aloizos et al, a civil dispute pending in the Southern District of Florida under docket 25-cv-60090. The report likely addresses dispositive or procedural matters, with further court action expected.