Browse Cases

District of Columbia

This criminal case involves the United States government prosecuting Franklin and others under docket number 04-cr-00128. The most recent docket entry reflects an extension of time granted to file a document, indicating ongoing procedural developments in the case.

District of Columbia

In Summerville v. Fordham et al, the court has recorded the waiver of service, indicating that the defendants have acknowledged receipt of the complaint without requiring formal service. This procedural step allows the case to proceed without delay related to service issues. Further substantive details of the dispute

Northern District of Illinois

Isak et al v. Heath et al is currently managing procedural deadlines, as indicated by set or reset deadlines. This suggests the case is active with ongoing motions or discovery, but substantive issues are not detailed.

Northern District of Illinois

Etienne v. Florida Department of Children and Families et al involves a court order granting leave to file a review. The specifics of the underlying dispute and the nature of the review sought are not detailed. The case likely involves civil claims against a state agency related to child welfare or administrative

Northern District of Illinois

In the case of Schoenmann et al v. Rund, docket number 25-cv-08065, the parties have submitted a status report to the court. While specific details of the dispute are not provided, the filing indicates ongoing procedural developments in the litigation. The case remains active, with the parties updating the court on

District of New Jersey

In the case of Cesar Torres Lugo v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al, the matter involves a procedural step concerning the remand of the case to the Superior Court. The filing referenced is a Letter of Transmittal related to the remand process, indicating that the case is being

Central District of California

The case titled Hung Van Ly v. Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, docket number 26-cv-01603, involves litigation against the Department of Homeland Security. The specific details of the claims or relief sought are not provided in the available information. The recent filing noted is a Notice of Appearance

Northern District of Illinois

In the case titled Alvarez Benedicks et al v. United States of America, docket number 1:26-cv-02966, plaintiffs Alvarez Benedicks and others have initiated legal action against the United States government. A summons has been issued to the United States, indicating the commencement of formal proceedings. Specific

Central District of California

Zahra Shokri Varaniab et al. v. Joseph B. Edlow et al. is a case where the court's decision is not available. The case details are also unknown.

District of Colorado

Alston and co-plaintiffs sued 3100 MP Parking Corp. under docket 26-cv-01090. The court has issued an order for an initial pretrial conference, placing this case at its earliest active stage. The sole corporate defendant operates in the parking industry. Multi-plaintiff suits against parking operators typically

Southern District of New York

Letter Motion No. 264 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York addresses a formal legal document submitted by the government. The motion pertains to case 23-cr-00261.

Southern District of New York

The filing in the Fresquez et al v. Town of Center litigation represents the ongoing dispute between residents and local government authorities. The specifics of the claims and the legal framework are not detailed in the summary, indicating a complex municipal liability case.

Central District of California

This civil case involves Crumbsie and Schwabb et al, with a note regarding service on a self-represented party. The details of the case and the nature of the service issue are not elaborated in the summary.

Central District of California

In the case of Northwest Administrators Inc v. Granite Construction Company, the plaintiff, Northwest Administrators Inc., has filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, indicating that the case has been resolved or terminated without prejudice. This action may have been taken due to a settlement, dismissal for lack of

Western District of Washington

Awambu has filed an opposition to a motion in a civil case against the Department of Corrections, docket 26-cv-01414. This opposition indicates active litigation and contestation of procedural or substantive issues involving a government entity.

Southern District of New York

The Trustees of the Chicago Painters and Decorators Pension Fund and others have initiated litigation against Genesis Painting & Decorating, Co. Details are sparse, but the involvement of a pension fund suggests potential disputes over contributions, benefits, or fiduciary responsibilities.

Southern District of New York

Plaintiff Clark filed suit against Gurley and additional defendants in a case docketed as 4:26-cv-00056. The most recent docket activity is a withdrawn motion at entry 21, indicating a party pulled a pending filing before resolution. The case details are sparse. The withdrawal of a motion mid-litigation can reflect

Southern District of New York

Cuong Nguyen v. Individuals and Entities Identified on Schedule A is a civil case involving multiple defendants. The recent filing of a certificate or proof of service indicates that defendants have been formally served with legal documents, advancing the procedural posture. The nature of the claims is not specified

Southern District of New York

Rahmat H Khan v. Joseph B Edlow et al was voluntarily dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This indicates the plaintiff chose to end the litigation without a court order, typically before the defendant answered or filed a motion. No further proceedings are ongoing, and the dismissal likely

Southern District of New York

In the case of Narkiewicz-Laine v. Thorndale Beach Condominium Association et al, the plaintiff brought a legal action against the condominium association and potentially other defendants. The case, docket number 26-cv-02603, involves a judgment as indicated by the docket entry AO450. While specific facts and claims