1:26-cv-01090 Alston et al v. 3100 MP Parking Corp.
Order for Initial Pretrial Conference ( 6
Alston and co-plaintiffs sued 3100 MP Parking Corp. under docket 26-cv-01090. The court has issued an order for an initial pretrial conference, placing this case at its earliest active stage. The sole corporate defendant operates in the parking industry. Multi-plaintiff suits against parking operators typically involve premises liability, wage disputes, or consumer fraud. No court is identified in the available record.
Latest development
Order · April 20, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingA federal court issued an order scheduling an Initial Pretrial Conference in Alston et al. v. 3100 MP Parking Corp., docket 26-cv-01090.
No judge has been assigned yet, and the filing date is not on record. The case is active.
The plaintiffs are a group identified as Alston et al. The defendant is 3100 MP Parking Corp., a parking facility operator. The underlying claims have not been detailed in available filings, but the case is moving toward its first substantive court appearance.
On April 20, 2026, the court entered the order setting the Initial Pretrial Conference. That conference is the first moment the parties and the court will match on a schedule — discovery deadlines, motion practice, and any early settlement posture. Nothing in the record yet shows what the plaintiffs are seeking or what defenses the operator intends to raise.
The court and judge assignment are still pending. Until a judge is assigned, case management will be limited to administrative scheduling. The pretrial conference order signals the case is past intake and moving into active litigation.
Order for Initial Pretrial Conference ( 6
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court issued an order.
Order for Initial Pretrial Conference ( 6
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 hours, 4 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.