Browse Cases

Central District of California

Keiron M. Elias sued Rosas over a business dispute in the Central District of California. The docket includes notices related to the case, reflecting ongoing procedural activity. The dispute centers on business dealings between the parties.

Central District of California

Todd J. Tibbs filed a contract dispute lawsuit against Randolf Grounds in the Central District of California. The court granted an extension of time for filing documents, indicating ongoing procedural developments. The case remains active with pending filings.

Northern District of California

The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case against Target Corporation in the Northern District of California. The dismissal was stipulated by both parties, ending the litigation without a trial or judgment on the merits. Attorney fees were a noted issue in the case docket.

Central District of California

Santibanez filed suit against Style Capital Corporation in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-04848. The plaintiff requested summons, marking the procedural start of the case and enabling service of process.

Central District of California

Santibanez sued Rockin' Horse, Inc. over a business dispute in the Central District of California, docket 26-cv-04847. The plaintiff requested summons issuance, signaling the initiation of formal service and commencement of litigation.

Northern District of California

K.R. et al filed suit against the County of Sonoma et al in the Northern District of California, docket 25-cv-09660. The parties submitted a case management statement, outlining the litigation schedule and procedural plans.

District of New Jersey

Montalbano v. Amazon Web Services, Inc. is before the District of New Jersey under docket 24-cv-10271. The parties participated in a settlement conference, indicating efforts to resolve the dispute without trial.

Southern District of Florida

Capote Gonzalez sued the Secretary of Homeland Security in the Southern District of Florida, docket 25-cv-24444. The case is active with recent status reports indicating ongoing case management and procedural monitoring.

Southern District of Florida

Dixon brought a federal lawsuit against Wyndham Hotels and Resorts in the Southern District of Florida, docket 25-cv-61215. Recent filings include notices unrelated to dispositive motions, suggesting procedural developments rather than substantive rulings.

Southern District of Florida

Cruise America Associates filed suit against Absolute Nevada in the Southern District of Florida, docket 22-cv-60094. The latest filing is a status report, reflecting ongoing case management and monitoring of litigation progress.

Southern District of Florida

American Tugs Offshore initiated a lawsuit against OTB Waste Resources in the Southern District of Florida, docket 25-cv-22581. The case involves a federal claim, with recent filings including notices unrelated to dispositive motions, indicating early procedural activity.

Northern District of Illinois

In Henigan v. Blanton et al, counsel filed a notice to withdraw as attorney in the Northern District of Illinois under docket 18-cv-02229. This procedural development signals a change in legal representation for one party, which could influence case progress.

Northern District of Illinois

In Cohen v. Lightning Protection Institute, the attorney of record filed a motion to withdraw representation in the Northern District of Illinois. The case docket number is 25-cv-14985. The withdrawal may affect the pace and strategy of the litigation going forward.

Northern District of Illinois

In Henderson v. Cook County et al, the Northern District of Illinois granted a motion to reopen the case. This allows the plaintiff to pursue claims after a prior closure or dismissal.

Southern District of Florida

Hilson v. Silva Structures, Inc. in the Southern District of Florida concluded with a stipulation of dismissal filed by the parties. This indicates a voluntary resolution or settlement.

Southern District of Florida

The Southern District of Florida entered a default judgment in Marcano et al v. Etesor Enterprises Inc. et al. The defendant failed to respond, allowing the plaintiffs to obtain judgment by default.

Southern District of Florida

Amaya et al v. Amsterdam Restaurant, Inc. et al in the Southern District of Florida requested an extension of time. The court must decide whether to grant additional time for compliance or filings.

District of New Jersey

Jones v. Polyguard Group, LLC et al in the District of New Jersey had hearings scheduled by the court. Setting hearings signals movement toward resolving disputes or managing case progress.

District of New Jersey

In DGO Power and Control, L.L.C. v. Cogen Technologies Linden Venture, L.P. et al, the District of New Jersey docketed a joint discovery plan. The parties agreed on timelines and procedures for exchanging evidence.

District of Massachusetts

The District of Massachusetts assigned Shu v. Massachusetts General Brigham to a magistrate judge. This assignment delegates certain pretrial matters to the magistrate to streamline case management.