criminal-case criminal-law federal-courts

Hearings Set in Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority in District of New Jersey

25-cv-14449 D.N.J.
Active Hearing stage Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Burns brought a civil suit against the Chicago Transit Authority in the District of New Jersey, docket 25-cv-14449. The court has set or reset hearings, indicating ongoing procedural scheduling and active case management.

Latest development

2:21-cr-00276-1 USA v. BURNS

Hearing · May 6, 2026

The court set or reset hearings for the case USA v. BURNS (2:21-cr-00276-1), which is related to Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority. This means that the court has scheduled new or revised dates for the hearings in this case. The exact nature of the hearings and the reasons for the changes are not specified.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Public transit liability
  • Hearing scheduling
  • Plaintiff claims against government entities
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Hearing stage

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:21-cr-00276-1 USA v. BURNS

Hearing · May 06, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

1 Defendant

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a hearing dated May 06, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Chicago Transit Authority and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 23 hours ago

Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority is an active criminal matter in District of New Jersey under docket 25-cv-14449.

The main identified defendant or respondent is Chicago Transit Authority. Juryvine classifies the matter around criminal case, criminal law, federal courts.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a hearing: The court set or reset hearings for the case USA v. BURNS (2:21-cr-00276-1), which is related to Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority.

This means that the court has scheduled new or revised dates for the hearings in this case. The exact nature of the hearings. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an extension of time for the Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority case, allowing the parties to continue with the proceedings. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to prepare and respond to the case. The.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest hearing produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
groups
Hearing May 6, 2026

2:21-cr-00276-1 USA v. BURNS

The court set or reset hearings for the case USA v. BURNS (2:21-cr-00276-1), which is related to Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority. This means that the court has scheduled new or revised dates for the hearings in this case. The exact nature of the hearings and the reasons for the changes are not specified.

info
Other May 5, 2026

1:25-cv-14449 Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority

The court granted an extension of time for the Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority case, allowing the parties to continue with the proceedings. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to prepare and respond to the case. The extension is likely due to the complexity of the case or the need for additional information.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

16 hours, 14 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.