Hearings Set in Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority in District of New Jersey
Case Summary
Burns brought a civil suit against the Chicago Transit Authority in the District of New Jersey, docket 25-cv-14449. The court has set or reset hearings, indicating ongoing procedural scheduling and active case management.
Latest development
2:21-cr-00276-1 USA v. BURNS
Hearing · May 6, 2026
The court set or reset hearings for the case USA v. BURNS (2:21-cr-00276-1), which is related to Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority. This means that the court has scheduled new or revised dates for the hearings in this case. The exact nature of the hearings and the reasons for the changes are not specified.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Public transit liability
- • Hearing scheduling
- • Plaintiff claims against government entities
Docket Snapshot
Court
D.N.J.
District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Hearing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:21-cr-00276-1 USA v. BURNS
Hearing · May 06, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant
4 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.
The newest docket activity we have is a hearing dated May 06, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Chicago Transit Authority and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
The Story So Far
Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority is an active criminal matter in District of New Jersey under docket 25-cv-14449.
The main identified defendant or respondent is Chicago Transit Authority. Juryvine classifies the matter around criminal case, criminal law, federal courts.
The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.
On May 6, 2026, the docket recorded a hearing: The court set or reset hearings for the case USA v. BURNS (2:21-cr-00276-1), which is related to Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority.
This means that the court has scheduled new or revised dates for the hearings in this case. The exact nature of the hearings. On May 5, 2026, the docket recorded a other: The court granted an extension of time for the Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority case, allowing the parties to continue with the proceedings. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to prepare and respond to the case. The.
The next thing to watch is whether the latest hearing produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Set/Reset Hearings
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.
Case Timeline
2 events2:21-cr-00276-1 USA v. BURNS
The court set or reset hearings for the case USA v. BURNS (2:21-cr-00276-1), which is related to Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority. This means that the court has scheduled new or revised dates for the hearings in this case. The exact nature of the hearings and the reasons for the changes are not specified.
1:25-cv-14449 Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority
The court granted an extension of time for the Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority case, allowing the parties to continue with the proceedings. This extension is significant because it gives the parties more time to prepare and respond to the case. The extension is likely due to the complexity of the case or the need for additional information.
Press Coverage
1:25-cv-14449 Burns v. Chicago Transit Authority
Extension of Time ( 18
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
16 hours, 14 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.