4:25-cv-10695 Partosan v. SSA Commissioner
Brief in Social Security Action ( 16
The court has issued a verdict in the case of USA v. Brown, sentencing the defendant to a specific term. The sentence was handed down in response to the defendant's Sentencing Memorandum, which outlined the relevant factors and circumstances. This verdict has significant implications for the defendant's future.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
5 events
Coverage
5 articles
Sources
3
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
4:25-cv-10695 Partosan v. SSA Commissioner
Other · May 04, 2026
Coverage
5 articles
3 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 2 Plaintiffs
7 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes SSA Commissioner, 3:24-cv-08003 Williams, 4:25-cv-10695 Partosan and others.
Press monitoring has found 5 related articles from 3 distinct sources.
Sentencing Memorandum ( 34
Open original open_in_newStipulation and Proposed Order ( 29
Open original open_in_newStipulation and Proposed Order ( 16
Open original open_in_new1 - Terminate Hearings ( 151
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
A brief was filed.
The court has issued a verdict in the case of USA v. Brown, sentencing the defendant to a specific term. The sentence was handed down in response to the defendant's Sentencing Memorandum, which outlined the relevant factors and circumstances. This verdict has significant implications for the defendant's future.
The court issued an order.
The court issued an order.
The SSA Commissioner terminated benefits for Brown in a hearing, citing a lack of evidence supporting her claim. This decision is significant because it affects Brown's financial well-being and access to essential services. The hearing's outcome will likely be appealed.
Brief in Social Security Action ( 16
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 29
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 16
Sources tracked
3 outlets · 5 articles
Timeline events
5 records on file
Last updated
15 hours, 22 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.