Art Heavy Haul files brief supporting consent motion for Rule 35 discovery
Case Summary
Brief in Support to 17 Consent MOTION for Discovery for Rule 35 Examination filed by Art Heavy Haul, Inc., James D. Hart. (Beck, Donald) (Entered: 04/05/2019)
Latest development
Brief in Support to 17 Consent MOTION for Discovery for Rule 35 Examination filed by Art Heavy Haul, Inc., James D. Hart. (Beck, Donald) (Entered: 04/05/2019)
Motion · May 9, 2026
Art Heavy Haul filed a Motion.
Docket Snapshot
Court
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Motion practice
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Brief in Support to 17 Consent MOTION for Discovery for Rule 35 Examination filed by Art Heavy Haul, Inc., James D.
Motion · May 10, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a motion dated May 10, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source expand_more
Brief in Support to 17 Consent MOTION for Discovery for Rule 35 Examination filed by Art Heavy Haul, Inc., James D. Hart. (Beck, Donald) (Entered: 04/05/2019)
Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
1 eventBrief in Support to 17 Consent MOTION for Discovery for Rule 35 Examination filed by Art Heavy Haul, Inc., James D. Hart. (Beck, Donald) (Entered: 04/05/2019)
Art Heavy Haul filed a Motion.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 hours, 15 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.