1:26-cv-04665 Chen v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Seal Document ( 4
BRIDLINGTON BUD LTD v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A is a civil case with docket number 25-cv-24123. The court has issued an order on a sealed motion, but further details are not available.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
26 events
Coverage
26 articles
Sources
2
BRIDLINGTON BUD LTD v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A is a civil case with docket number 25-cv-24123. The court has issued an order on a sealed motion, but further details are not available.
The case is currently active, and a judge has not yet been assigned. The court has been informed of several related cases, including Howard Robinson v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, which was filed on April 24, 2026.
The next step in the case will be for the parties to file their responses to the sealed motion, which is expected to be due soon. The court will then review the responses and make a decision on the motion. The outcome of the motion will have a significant impact on the case, and it is expected to be a major development in the litigation.
Order to Show Cause ( 15
Open original open_in_newOrder on Motion for Default Judgment ( 46
Open original open_in_newOrder on Sealed Motion ( 19
Open original open_in_newOrder on Motion to Strike
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court sealed a document in the case of Chen v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, which is related to the case of Bridlington Bud Ltd v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This action suggests that sensitive information is involved in the case. The sealing of the document will prevent public access to the information it contains.
The court granted leave to file a document in the case of Hyundai Motor Company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This document is likely a new filing in the ongoing litigation. The court's decision allows the parties to proceed with the filing.
The court issued an order.
A new case, Howard Robinson v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, was filed in the court. This case is related to the ongoing litigation in BRIDLINGTON BUD LTD v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. The filing of this new case may indicate a change in strategy or a new development in the case.
The court has issued a notice in the case of Sandra E. Kuck v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, which is related to the case BRIDLINGTON BUD LTD v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This notice is likely a procedural step in the ongoing litigation. The exact nature of the notice is not specified.
The court has scheduled a new case, Philippa Kirsten Tacla v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, with docket number 1:26-cv-04644. This case is related to the ongoing litigation in BRIDLINGTON BUD LTD v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. The new case may impact the outcome of the original case.
A Motion was filed.
A Motion was filed.
The court granted an extension of time for Theodoros Zirinis to file a complaint in the case BRIDLINGTON BUD LTD v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This extension allows Zirinis to file the complaint 36 days after the original deadline. The extension is significant because it gives Zirinis more time to prepare and file the complaint.
The court granted an extension of time for the Abraham Hunter case, allowing additional time for the parties to proceed. This extension was requested by the parties and granted by the court. The extension will impact the timeline for the case.
The court granted an extension of time for Roger Hall to file a motion in the case BRIDLINGTON BUD LTD v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This extension allows Hall to delay filing the motion until a later date. The extension is significant because it gives Hall more time to prepare his motion.
The court granted leave to file a document in the case of Netflix, Inc. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This decision allows the parties to proceed with the filing of the document, which is likely a key piece of evidence in the case. The court's ruling is significant because it enables the parties to move forward with the case.
The court has been informed of a related case, 1:25-cv-13831, which involves Yiwu Baimei Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule 'A'. This case is likely connected to the ongoing litigation between Bridlington Bud Ltd and the same defendants. The court will need to consider the implications of this new case on the existing proceedings.
The court granted an extension of time for Edward Wargo to file a document in the case BRIDLINGTON BUD LTD v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This extension allows Wargo to submit the document by a later deadline. The extension is relevant to the ongoing case.
The court granted leave to file a document in the case of Christian Dior Couture, S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This decision allows the parties to proceed with the filing of the document, which is likely a key piece of evidence in the case. The court's ruling is significant because it enables the parties to move forward with the litigation.
The court granted leave to file a document in the case of Ouyang Haodong v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A. This decision allows the parties to proceed with filing the document, which is likely a key piece of evidence or a motion. The outcome of this case may have significant implications for the parties involved.
The court granted leave to file a document in the case of Zhenbiao Zhang v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This means that the court has allowed the filing of a specific document in the case. The document is likely related to the ongoing litigation between the parties.
The court granted leave to file a document in the case of Zhenbiao Zhang v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This decision allows the parties to proceed with the filing of the document, which is likely a key piece of evidence in the case. The filing is part of the ongoing litigation in the case.
The court granted leave to file a document in the case of Mattel, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This decision allows the parties to proceed with the filing of the document, which is likely a key piece of evidence in the case. The outcome of this case may have significant implications for the parties involved.
The court has denied a motion in the case of Huang v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, which was filed as part of a larger case, Bridlington Bud Ltd v. The Partnerships, Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A. This motion was likely related to a procedural or discovery issue. The denial of this motion means that the parties will have to proceed with the case as previously planned.
Seal Document ( 4
Leave to File Document ( 4
Order to Show Cause ( 15
Order on Motion for Default Judgment ( 46
Order on Sealed Motion ( 19
Extension of Time ( 36
Extension of Time ( 36
Extension of Time ( 43
Leave to File Document ( 4
Extension of Time ( 52
Leave to File Document ( 4
Leave to File Document ( 8
Leave to File Document ( 5
Leave to File Document ( 5
Leave to File Document ( 4
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 26 articles
Timeline events
26 records on file
Last updated
16 hours, 20 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.