legal-news

Bias et al v. Elephant Insurance Company et al

26-mc-91140
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Bias et al v. Elephant Insurance Company et al is a case currently pending in an unknown court. The case has been certified for an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) session, as indicated by the docket number 26-mc-91140. This certification suggests that the parties involved have agreed to participate in a non-binding dispute resolution process to resolve their differences without going to trial.

Latest development

1:26-mc-91140 Bias et al v. Elephant Insurance Company et al

Motion · April 23, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • ADR certification
  • Elephant Insurance Company
  • Bias et al
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
edit_note
Motion 1 day ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Memorandum in Support of Motion ( 17

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
info
Other April 23, 2026

3:25-cv-07183 Azim v. Essentia Insurance Company et al

The court certified an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) session in the case Azim v. Essentia Insurance Company et al, which is a separate case from Bias et al v. Elephant Insurance Company et al. This certification allows the parties to participate in a non-binding mediation to resolve their disputes. The ADR session is a voluntary process that aims to help a settlement between the parties.

edit_note
Motion April 23, 2026

1:26-mc-91140 Bias et al v. Elephant Insurance Company et al

A Motion was filed.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

1 day, 2 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.