1:25-cv-09151 Morgan v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
The court processed a pro se payment of fees in the case of Morgan v. NYC Department of Corrections et al. This payment is likely related to the case's ongoing proceedings. The payment's processing indicates that the court is moving forward with the case.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:25-cv-09151 Morgan v. NYC Department of Corrections et al
Other · May 05, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
2 sources tracked
Participants
2 Defendants, 2 Government Agencys
6 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Illinois Department of Corrections, NYC Department of Corrections and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
The court processed a pro se payment of fees in the case of Morgan v. NYC Department of Corrections et al. This payment is likely related to the case's ongoing proceedings. The payment's processing indicates that the court is moving forward with the case.
The court granted a motion to appear pro hac vice for a lawyer in the Bernard v. Illinois Department of Corrections case. This means the lawyer can participate in the case despite not being licensed in the state of Illinois. The lawyer's involvement is likely to aid the plaintiff in their lawsuit.
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
Appear Pro Hac Vice ( 230
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 5 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.