newspaper
1:17-cv-02637 Barnett v. New York Police Department
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
May 5, 2026
1 min read
legal-news
Batista v. New York Police Department et al
17-cv-01994
S.D.N.Y.
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The court processed a payment for a pro se litigant in the case of Barnett v. New York Police Department. This payment is likely related to filing fees or other costs associated with the case. The payment was made by the litigant themselves, without the assistance of an attorney.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
fact_check
Docket Snapshot
account_balance
Court
S.D.N.Y.
Southern District of New York · 2nd Circuit · NY
tag
Docket
Not captured
Civil
timeline
Stage
Active litigation
Active
event
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
new_releases
Latest Filing
1:17-cv-02637 Barnett v. New York Police Department
Other · May 05, 2026
newspaper
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
groups
Participants
1 Defendant
3 linked entities
gavel
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Southern District of New York, a federal district court in NY.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 05, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes New York Police Department and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
About This Court
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) is a federal district court in the 2nd Circuit, NY.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
2 events
info
Other
May 5, 2026
1:17-cv-02637 Barnett v. New York Police Department
The court processed a payment for a pro se litigant in the case of Barnett v. New York Police Department. This payment is likely related to filing fees or other costs associated with the case. The payment was made by the litigant themselves, without the assistance of an attorney.
info
Other
May 5, 2026
1:17-cv-01994 Batista v. New York Police Department et al
The court processed a payment for the plaintiff, Batista, who is representing himself in the case Batista v. New York Police Department et al. This payment is likely for a filing fee or other court costs associated with the case. The payment was made by the plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se.
Advertisement
newspaper
2 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
1:17-cv-01994 Batista v. New York Police Department et al
Pro Se Payment of Fee - Processed
May 5, 2026
1 min read
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
1 day, 6 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.