civil-litigation federal-courts

Baron App v. OpenAI: Dismissal Order Issued

25-cv-09268 D.N.J.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

The District of New Jersey court issued an order of dismissal in Baron App v. OpenAI under docket number 25-cv-09268. The dismissal indicates the court has ended the case, but the grounds for dismissal are not specified.

Latest development

3:25-cv-02219 EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. MOEN, INC. et al

Order · May 8, 2026

The court issued an order.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Case dismissal
  • District of New Jersey
  • Plaintiff vs. OpenAI
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

D.N.J.

District of New Jersey · 3rd Circuit · NJ

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

3:25-cv-02219 EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. MOEN, INC. et al

Order · May 08, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

2 articles

2 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Plaintiffs

4 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to District of New Jersey, a federal district court in NJ.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 08, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes 5:25-cv-09268 Baron App, Inc. d/b/a/ Cameo, 3:25-cv-02219 EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY and others.

Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 2 distinct sources.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 days, 11 hours ago

Baron App, Inc. d/b/a/ Cameo v. OpenAI, Inc. et al is an active civil matter in District of New Jersey under docket 25-cv-09268.

The main identified plaintiff or petitioner is 5:25-cv-09268 Baron App, Inc. d/b/a/ Cameo and 3:25-cv-02219 EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY. Juryvine classifies the matter around civil litigation, federal courts.

The available docket gives enough signal to track the case, but not enough to overstate the merits. This page will become more useful as filings, orders, hearings, and party appearances add detail.

On May 8, 2026, the docket recorded a order: The court issued an order. On May 4, 2026, the docket recorded a other: Baron App, Inc. d/b/a Cameo filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, Inc.

and others in the Northern District of California. The lawsuit is related to the use of AI technology. This event is significant because it highlights the growing legal scene surrounding AI.

The next thing to watch is whether the latest order produces a substantive order, a scheduling change, a settlement signal, or a filing that clarifies the parties' positions.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 2 days ago
The court issued an order.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order of Dismissal ( 41

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

District of New Jersey (D.N.J.) is a federal district court in the 3rd Circuit, NJ.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order May 8, 2026

3:25-cv-02219 EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. MOEN, INC. et al

The court issued an order.

info
Other May 4, 2026

5:25-cv-09268 Baron App, Inc. d/b/a/ Cameo v. OpenAI, Inc. et al

Baron App, Inc. d/b/a Cameo filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, Inc. and others in the Northern District of California. The lawsuit is related to the use of AI technology. This event is significant because it highlights the growing legal scene surrounding AI development and its potential impact on businesses.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 2 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

20 hours, 20 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.