The case 'cl-docket-463503500' involves a petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Saint Louis Oges on May 7, 2026 E3. The filing includes 18 exhibits, ranging from legal documents to supporting evidence E3. While the docket number remains unassigned, the case is classified as an active civil matter E4. The petition's complexity is evident in its extensive documentation, though no specific claims or relief sought are detailed in the available records E3.
Judicial Assignments
The case is presided over by Sarah F. Russell, according to Juryvine timeline narration E5. multiple judicial names appear in the records, including Barbara C. Andrews, all listed as Presiding Judges in this matter [E38, [E41, E44]]. This discrepancy may reflect procedural changes or overlapping jurisdictions. Russell is explicitly identified as the presiding judge in multiple sources, suggesting she holds primary responsibility for the case E45.
Related Cases
The case shows connections to at least five other habeas corpus petitions, all sharing legal vocabulary overlaps across nine key terms. These include 'Hyde et al: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Filed' (26-cv-11962) with a similarity score of 0.39 E46, 'Khalilov v. Putra et al' (26-cv-05039) at 0.38 E48, and 'Habeas Corpus Petition Filed in Marroquin v. Blanche et al' (26-cv-23128) at 0.36 E50. The pattern suggests a potential cluster of similar petitions, though no direct linkage between the cases is confirmed [E47, [E49, E51]].
Procedural Context
Court docket updates on May 9, 2026, indicate ongoing activity, though specific actions remain unspecified [E8, [E10, E12]]. The case remains pending before an unspecified court, with no indication of dismissal or transfer E1. Multiple related organizations, including Google LLC and Equip Brands LLC, are listed as involved parties, though their roles are not clarified [E39, E40]. The lack of court identification complicates efforts to track procedural milestones or locate additional filings E1.
What Comes Next
The case's trajectory depends on judicial scheduling and the resolution of procedural questions. The presence of multiple judges raises questions about jurisdictional coordination. Meanwhile, the similarity to other habeas corpus petitions may prompt further scrutiny of legal strategies or systemic issues. No further filings or rulings are currently documented, leaving the case in a state of procedural limbo [E1, E4].
What The Record Shows
Docket Record
- The case "cl-docket-463503500" (docket unassigned) is pending before an unspecified court E1.
- PETITION for writ of habeas corpus filed by Saint Louis Oges (Attachments: # 1 Index, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 E3.
- cl-docket-463503500 is an active civil matter E4.
- The case is assigned to Sarah F E5.