1:26-cv-11293 Gonzalez Guerrero v. Wesling et al
Order Dismissing Case ( 11
The court granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Araujo Da Silva v. Wesling et al, allowing the plaintiff to challenge their detention. This decision has significant implications for the plaintiff's freedom and the underlying reasons for their detention. The writ will be reviewed by the court to determine the validity of the detention.
Latest development
Order · May 4, 2026
The court issued an order.
description View filingCourt
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
1:26-cv-11293 Gonzalez Guerrero v. Wesling et al
Order · May 04, 2026
Coverage
2 articles
1 source tracked
Participants
2 Plaintiffs
3 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 04, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 1:26-cv-12007 Araujo Da Silva, 1:26-cv-11293 Gonzalez Guerrero and others.
Press monitoring has found 2 related articles from 1 distinct source.
Order Dismissing Case ( 11
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
The court issued an order.
The court granted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the case of Araujo Da Silva v. Wesling et al, allowing the plaintiff to challenge their detention. This decision has significant implications for the plaintiff's freedom and the underlying reasons for their detention. The writ will be reviewed by the court to determine the validity of the detention.
Order Dismissing Case ( 11
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - 2241 ( 1
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
23 hours, 17 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.