Application by the United States for a Search Warrant for Six Subject Devices for the Investigation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958 and Other Offenses
Case Summary
4:25-mj-71157-1 Application by the United States for a Search Warrant for One Subject Premises for the Investigation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958 and Other Offenses
Latest development
4:25-mj-71157-1 Application by the United States for a Search Warrant for One Subject Premises for the Investigation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958 and Other Offenses
Order · May 11, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingDocket Snapshot
Court
N.D. Cal.
Northern District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Court order issued
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
4:25-mj-71157-1 Application by the United States for a Search Warrant for One Subject Premises for the Investigation of
Order · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
0 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to Northern District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 11, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
The Story So Far
The United States filed an application for a search warrant targeting six electronic devices in an investigation involving 18 U.S.C. § 1958, which addresses the use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission of murder-for-hire and related offenses. The case is docketed as 25-mj-71174 in the Northern District of California.
The government seeks access to data on these devices to uncover evidence related to the alleged criminal conduct. The court has not yet assigned a judge to the matter, and the case remains active.
The government also filed a motion to seal certain documents, which the court addressed in a recent order. The motion to seal typically aims to protect sensitive information in the warrant application or supporting materials from public disclosure, given the nature of the investigation. The order on this motion indicates the court's engagement with balancing transparency against investigative confidentiality.
No further details about the underlying facts or the specific offenses beyond the citation to 18 U.S.C. § 1958 have been publicly disclosed. The timing of the warrant application and the motion suggests the investigation is in its early stages.
The government’s focus on electronic devices matches with common investigative strategies in cases involving communications and planning of crimes over interstate lines.
The next steps in the case will likely involve the court’s ruling on the search warrant application itself. Once a judge is assigned, the court will decide whether probable cause exists to authorize the search and seizure of data from the six devices. This decision will determine the scope and direction of the investigation going forward.
The case remains under seal in part, limiting public insight into the government's evidence and strategy at this time.
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion to Seal ( 17
Open original open_in_newreceipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion to Seal ( 17
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
About This Court
Northern District of California (N.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Case Timeline
2 events4:25-mj-71157-1 Application by the United States for a Search Warrant for One Subject Premises for the Investigation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958 and Other Offenses
A Motion was filed.
4:25-mj-71174-1 Application by the United States for a Search Warrant for Six Subject Devices for the Investigation of 18 U.S.C. § 1958 and Other Offenses
A Motion was filed.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
42 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.