ET: Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has commented on Apple’s filing to the Supreme Court. Apple has filed an application with the Supreme Court asking it to stay the Ninth Circuit’s mandate, which would send the case back to the District Court to determine what it can charge for purchases made outside the App Store. District Court for the Northern District of California found Apple in contempt of a 2021 injunction related to off-App Store purchases. The injunction prohibited Apple from blocking developers from including buttons or links to alternative purchasing mechanisms, and from communicating with users about those options using contact information obtained in-app.
Latest development
Media Coverage · May 4, 2026
Apple has filed a request with the Supreme Court to delay the enforcement of a lower court's ruling that could force the company to allow developers to include buttons or links to alternative purchasing mechanisms outside of the App Store. The dispute centers on Apple's commission fees for in-app purchases. The Ninth Circuit's mandate would send the case back to the District Court to determine what fees Apple can
newspaper Read articleCourt
Court not identified
Awaiting court metadata
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
Apple files for Supreme Court stay in Epic case over off - App Store commission dispute
Media Coverage · May 05, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
Parties not parsed yet
1 linked entity
Judge
Not assigned in feed
The court metadata has not been resolved yet, so Juryvine is keeping the page conservative until a reliable court match lands.
The newest docket activity we have is a media coverage dated May 05, 2026.
Party extraction has not produced a reliable plaintiff/defendant graph yet, so no speculative names are shown.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
ET: Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has commented on Apple’s filing to the Supreme Court. Apple has filed an application with the Supreme Court asking it to stay the Ninth Circuit’s mandate, which would send the case back to the District Court to determine what it can charge for purchases made outside the App Store. District Court for the Northern District of California found Apple in contempt of a 2021 injunction related to off-App Store purchases. The injunction prohibited Apple from blocking devel
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Apple has filed a request with the Supreme Court to delay the enforcement of a lower court's ruling that could force the company to allow developers to include buttons or links to alternative purchasing mechanisms outside of the App Store. The dispute centers on Apple's commission fees for in-app purchases. The Ninth Circuit's mandate would send the case back to the District Court to determine what fees Apple can charge.
ET: Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has commented on Apple’s filing to the Supreme Court. Apple has filed an application with the Supreme Court asking it to stay the Ninth …
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
2 days, 2 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.