2:23-cv-08963 Anthony Raye Hoskins v. L. Lundy et al
Financial Entry IFP Filing Fee
Anthony Raye Hoskins filed a financial entry in the case of Hoskins v. L. Lundy et al, indicating that he is seeking to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which means he is requesting to proceed with the case without paying the filing fee. This filing is a common step for individuals who cannot afford the costs associated with litigation. The court will review Hoskins' financial information to determine whether he qualifies for IFP status.
Latest development
Filing · May 1, 2026
Anthony Raye Hoskins filed a financial entry in the case of Hoskins v. L. Lundy et al, indicating that he is seeking to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which means he is requesting to proceed with the case without paying the filing fee. This filing is a common step for individuals who cannot afford the costs associated with litigation. The court will review Hoskins' financial information to determine whether he
description View filingCourt
C.D. Cal.
Central District of California · 9th Circuit · CA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Initial filing stage
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
2:23-cv-08963 Anthony Raye Hoskins v. L. Lundy et al
Filing · May 01, 2026
Coverage
1 article
1 source tracked
Participants
1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
This case is tied to Central District of California, a federal district court in CA.
The newest docket activity we have is a filing dated May 01, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes 2:23-cv-08963 Anthony Raye Hoskins and others.
Press monitoring has found 1 related article from 1 distinct source.
Financial Entry IFP Filing Fee
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Central District of California (C.D. Cal.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, CA.
Anthony Raye Hoskins filed a financial entry in the case of Hoskins v. L. Lundy et al, indicating that he is seeking to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which means he is requesting to proceed with the case without paying the filing fee. This filing is a common step for individuals who cannot afford the costs associated with litigation. The court will review Hoskins' financial information to determine whether he qualifies for IFP status.
Financial Entry IFP Filing Fee
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
19 hours, 20 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.