civil-litigation federal-courts

Amazon.com Inc. et al v. Shanghai Haoqi International Trade Co Ltd et al

25-cv-02482 W.D. Wash.
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

2:25-cv-02482 Amazon.com Inc et al v. Shanghai Haoqi International Trade Co Ltd et al

Latest development

2:23-cv-01219 Heck v. Amazon.com Inc et al

Order · May 12, 2026

A Motion was filed.

description View filing
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
fact_check

Docket Snapshot

account_balance

Court

W.D. Wash.

Western District of Washington · 9th Circuit · WA

tag

Docket

Not captured

Civil

timeline

Stage

Court order issued

Active

event

Filed

Date unavailable

Not in the available feed

new_releases

Latest Filing

2:23-cv-01219 Heck v. Amazon.com Inc et al

Order · May 12, 2026

newspaper

Coverage

0 articles

0 sources tracked

groups

Participants

2 Defendants, 1 Plaintiff, 1 Related Organization

5 linked entities

gavel

Judge

Not assigned in feed

What the record shows

This case is tied to Western District of Washington, a federal district court in WA.

The newest docket activity we have is a order dated May 12, 2026.

The visible party/entity graph currently includes Shanghai Xiaoxu International Trade Co., LTD, Amazon.com Inc, 2:25-cv-02482 Amazon.com Inc and others.

No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.

chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 2 hours, 31 minutes ago

Amazon.com Inc and related plaintiffs sued Shanghai Haoqi International Trade Co Ltd and others in the Western District of Washington, case number 25-cv-02482. The suit remains active with no judge assigned yet. The case involves a motion to intervene, which the court addressed in an order dated May 12, 2026.

On the same day, parties submitted an affidavit supporting the motion. The details of the underlying dispute have not been publicly disclosed, but the intervention request suggests a third party seeks to join the litigation, likely to protect its interests or influence the case's outcome.

The court's handling of the motion to intervene will shape the scope of the parties involved and the issues the court will consider. The absence of a judge assignment means the case is still in its early stages, with procedural matters like intervention and motions setting the groundwork.

Watch for the court to assign a judge and rule on the intervention motion, which will clarify the parties' scene and potentially accelerate discovery or other substantive proceedings.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event
gavel
Order 3 hours ago
A Motion was filed.
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order on Motion to Intervene ( 198

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

About This Court

Western District of Washington (W.D. Wash.) is a federal district court in the 9th Circuit, WA.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

2 events
gavel
Order May 12, 2026

2:23-cv-01219 Heck v. Amazon.com Inc et al

A Motion was filed.

info
Other May 12, 2026

2:25-cv-02482 Amazon.com Inc et al v. Shanghai Haoqi International Trade Co Ltd et al

An affidavit was filed.

Advertisement
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

0 outlets · 0 articles

Timeline events

2 records on file

Last updated

3 hours, 10 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.