Abrahamson Files Civil Rights Suit Against Holyoke Police Department
Case Summary
Abrahamson filed suit against the Holyoke Police Department and others in the District of Massachusetts, docket 26-cv-30074. The case likely involves civil rights or police misconduct claims, but no recent filings clarify the allegations or procedural posture.
No timeline activity recorded yet. This page will grow as rulings and filings land.
Key Issues
- • Police misconduct
- • Civil rights
- • Government defendants
- • Massachusetts law
Docket Snapshot
Court
D. Mass.
District of Massachusetts · 1st Circuit · MA
Docket
Not captured
Civil
Stage
Active litigation
Active
Filed
Date unavailable
Not in the available feed
Latest Filing
3:26-cv-30074 ABRAHAMSON v. Holyoke Police Department et al
Other · May 11, 2026
Coverage
0 articles
0 sources tracked
Participants
1 Defendant, 1 Plaintiff
2 linked entities
Judge
Not assigned in feed
What the record shows
This case is tied to District of Massachusetts, a federal district court in MA.
The newest docket activity we have is a other dated May 11, 2026.
The visible party/entity graph currently includes Holyoke Police Department, 3:26-cv-30074 ABRAHAMSON.
No independent press coverage is attached yet; this page is currently docket-led rather than media-led.
About This Court
District of Massachusetts (D. Mass.) is a federal district court in the 1st Circuit, MA.
Case Timeline
1 event3:26-cv-30074 ABRAHAMSON v. Holyoke Police Department et al
The case Abrahamson v. Holyoke Police Department et al was filed under docket number 3:26-cv-30074. This event marks the official initiation of the lawsuit against the Holyoke Police Department and other defendants. It matters because it sets the litigation process in motion, allowing the plaintiff to seek legal remedies.
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
0 outlets · 0 articles
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
1 hour, 21 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.