9:26-cv-80004 Blatt et al v. Goldner et al
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report ( 27
This civil litigation involves Blatt and others as plaintiffs against Goldner and others as defendants. The court has issued an order requiring the parties to submit a joint scheduling report, a standard procedural step to outline timelines for discovery, motions, and trial preparation. The order indicates the case is in early procedural stages, focusing on case management and coordination between parties. No substantive rulings or factual disputes are detailed at this time.
Latest development
Order · April 14, 2026
The court issued an order requiring the parties in the case Blatt et al v. Goldner et al to submit a joint scheduling report. This means both sides must agree on and present a timeline for how the case will proceed. It matters because establishing a schedule helps organize the case efficiently and ensures that deadlines are clear for all involved.
description View filingOrder Requiring Joint Scheduling Report ( 27
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court issued an order requiring the parties in the case Blatt et al v. Goldner et al to submit a joint scheduling report. This means both sides must agree on and present a timeline for how the case will proceed. It matters because establishing a schedule helps organize the case efficiently and ensures that deadlines are clear for all involved.
Order Requiring Joint Scheduling Report ( 27
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 1 article
Timeline events
1 record on file
Last updated
3 days, 21 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.