5:26-cv-01645 Bryan Martinez Marquez et al v. Markwayne Mullin et al
Case Summary
Bryan Martinez Marquez and others have initiated a civil action against Markwayne Mullin and others, with the case recently transferred electronically to a different district court. This procedural step facilitates proper venue or judicial assignment. Details on the nature of the claims are not provided, but the involvement of multiple plaintiffs and defendants suggests a potentially complex dispute. The transfer may affect litigation strategy and scheduling.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
6 events
Coverage
6 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Electronic case transfer
- • Venue assignment
- • Multi-party litigation
update What Changed This Week
Case Timeline
6 events5:26-cv-01441 Rossi Damary Canales Espinoza v. Markwayne Mullin et al
The court dismissed the case titled Rossi Damary Canales Espinoza v. Markwayne Mullin et al. This means the legal claims brought in this case will not proceed further in court. Dismissing a case can occur for various reasons, such as lack of evidence or jurisdiction issues.
5:26-cv-01474 Auxiliadora Sarai Benavente Uriarte v. Markwayne Mullin et al
In the case titled Auxiliadora Sarai Benavente Uriarte v. Markwayne Mullin et al, the court dismissed the case. This means the legal claims brought forward were officially ended without proceeding to trial or further litigation. Such dismissals can occur for various reasons, including procedural issues or settlement agreements.
2:26-cv-03546 Tung Thanh Nguyen Truong v. Markwayne Mullin et al
In the case of Tung Thanh Nguyen Truong v. Markwayne Mullin et al, related to immigration matters under case number 2:26-cv-03546, the parties gave full consent to proceed under the immigration statute 2241. This means the court agreed to handle the case fully, which often involves reviewing decisions related to immigration detention or removal. This step allows the case to move forward efficiently within the legal framework.
5:26-cv-01862 Oviedo Guadron v. Markwayne Mullin et al
In the case Oviedo Guadron v. Markwayne Mullin et al, the court issued a Temporary Restraining Order. This means the court has temporarily prohibited certain actions by the defendants to prevent potential harm while the case is ongoing. Such orders are crucial to maintain the status quo and protect the rights of the parties involved during litigation.
5:26-cv-01835 Vokan Umut Kafkas Can v. Mark Wayne Mullin et al
In the case of Vokan Umut Kafkas Can v. Mark Wayne Mullin et al, the court issued a scheduling order, which outlines important deadlines and procedures for how the case will proceed. This helps organize the timeline for filings, hearings, and other key steps in the litigation process.
5:26-cv-01645 Bryan Martinez Marquez et al v. Markwayne Mullin et al
The case involving Bryan Martinez Marquez and others against Markwayne Mullin and others was officially transferred to a different district court. This means the new court will now handle all proceedings related to this case. Such transfers can affect the timeline and management of the case.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
5:26-cv-01441 Rossi Damary Canales Espinoza v. Markwayne Mullin et al
Dismiss Case ( 11
5:26-cv-01474 Auxiliadora Sarai Benavente Uriarte v. Markwayne Mullin et al
Dismiss Case ( 13
2:26-cv-03546 Tung Thanh Nguyen Truong v. Markwayne Mullin et al
Immigration 2241 Full Consent
5:26-cv-01862 Oviedo Guadron v. Markwayne Mullin et al
Temporary Restraining Order ( 2
5:26-cv-01835 Vokan Umut Kafkas Can v. Mark Wayne Mullin et al
Notice (Scheduling Order 2241) - optional html form ( 4
5:26-cv-01645 Bryan Martinez Marquez et al v. Markwayne Mullin et al
Receipt of Case by Other District (Electronic Case Transfer)