5:25-cv-00860 VirtaMove, Corp. v. Google LLC
Case Summary
VirtaMove, Corp. filed a lawsuit against Google LLC, as indicated by the docket number 25-cv-00860. The case has progressed to the stage where a reply brief has been submitted, suggesting ongoing litigation possibly involving intellectual property or contractual disputes. Specific details about the claims or defenses are not provided.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
5 events
Coverage
5 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Intellectual property rights
- • Contractual obligations
- • Litigation procedure
update What Changed This Week
Case Timeline
5 events3:23-cv-02431 Doe I et al v. Google LLC
In the case VirtaMove, Corp. v. Google LLC, a supplemental brief was filed related to another case, Doe I et al v. Google LLC. This means the court received additional written arguments or information to consider in the ongoing litigation. Such briefs help clarify or expand on key points that may influence the court's decision.
1:20-cv-02862 Weisner v. Google LLC
In the case of Weisner v. Google LLC, a reply memorandum was filed to support a motion, indicating that one party responded to arguments previously made. This step is part of the legal process where parties clarify and reinforce their positions to persuade the court. It matters because it helps the judge understand the key points before making a decision on the motion.
5:24-cv-06101 Yelp Inc. v. Google LLC
In the case VirtaMove, Corp. v. Google LLC, a partial summary judgment was issued related to the separate but connected case Yelp Inc. v. Google LLC. This means the court made a preliminary decision on some legal issues without a full trial, which can streamline the resolution process. It matters because it can significantly affect the direction and outcome of both cases.
1:25-cv-00514 AccuSearch Technologies LLC v. Google LLC
In the case of AccuSearch Technologies LLC v. Google LLC, a reply brief was filed, which is a document responding to the opposing party's arguments. This step is part of the legal process where each side presents their points to support their case. It matters because it helps the court understand both parties' positions before making a decision.
5:25-cv-00860 VirtaMove, Corp. v. Google LLC
In the case between VirtaMove, Corp. and Google LLC, the parties submitted a joint agreement along with a proposed court order for the judge's approval. This indicates that both sides have reached a consensus on certain issues, which can help streamline the case and potentially avoid further disputes. Such agreements are important because they can save time and resources for the court and the parties involved.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
3:23-cv-02431 Doe I et al v. Google LLC
Supplemental Brief ( 288
1:20-cv-02862 Weisner v. Google LLC
Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion ( 533
5:24-cv-06101 Yelp Inc. v. Google LLC
Partial Summary Judgment ( 91
1:25-cv-00514 AccuSearch Technologies LLC v. Google LLC
Brief - Reply ( 72
5:25-cv-00860 VirtaMove, Corp. v. Google LLC
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 146