Beni v. Barclays Bank Delaware

description

Case Summary

This case, identical in title and docket to case 7528, also concerns Beni v. Barclays Bank Delaware and involves an extension of time to file a response or answer. The duplication suggests multiple related filings or entries regarding the procedural timeline. The case centers on a civil dispute involving a banking entity and an individual plaintiff.

Latest development

1:26-cv-00038 PROCTOR v. BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE et al

Hearing · April 15, 2026

A hearing was held in the case Proctor v. Barclays Bank Delaware, which is related to the broader case Beni v. Barclays Bank Delaware. During this hearing, the court set or reset important dates for future proceedings. This helps organize the timeline for how the case will move forward.

description View filing

Key Issues

• • Extension of response deadline
• • Procedural management
• • Banking litigation

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

groups

Hearing 3 days ago

A hearing was held in the case Proctor v. Barclays Bank Delaware, which is related to the broader case Beni v. Barclays Bank Delaware. During this hearing, the court set or reset important dates for future proceedings. This helps organize t

receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

~Util - Set/Reset Hearings

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Case Timeline

2 events

groups

Hearing April 15, 2026

1:26-cv-00038 PROCTOR v. BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE et al

A hearing was held in the case Proctor v. Barclays Bank Delaware, which is related to the broader case Beni v. Barclays Bank Delaware. During this hearing, the court set or reset important dates for future proceedings. This helps organize the timeline for how the case will move forward.

description View filing open_in_new

info

Other April 13, 2026

4:26-cv-10017 Beni v. Barclays Bank Delaware

In the case Beni v. Barclays Bank Delaware, the court granted an extension of time for one party to file their response, reply, or answer. This means the party has more time to prepare and submit their legal documents, ensuring they can adequately address the issues raised. Extensions like this help maintain fairness in the legal process by allowing sufficient time for thorough preparation.

description View filing open_in_new

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles

All No paywall (2) Original reporting (2)

newspaper

pacer

1:26-cv-00038 PROCTOR v. BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE et al

~Util - Set/Reset Hearings

Apr 15, 2026

newspaper

pacer

4:26-cv-10017 Beni v. Barclays Bank Delaware

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply/Answer ( 9

Apr 13, 2026