Sausalito Yacht Harbor v. S/V Dreamer

description

Case Summary

Sausalito Yacht Harbor initiated legal action against the vessel S/V Dreamer, with recent docket entries including an order on an ex parte application. This suggests urgent or preliminary relief was sought and granted or denied without the other party's presence, common in maritime or property disputes.

Latest development

4:26-cv-01921 Sausalito Yacht Harbor v. S/V Dreamer

Order · April 15, 2026

The court issued an order in the case between Sausalito Yacht Harbor and the vessel S/V Dreamer in response to an urgent, one-sided request known as an ex parte application. This means the court made a decision without hearing from the other party, likely due to the need for immediate action. Such orders can affect the rights or obligations of the parties involved before a full hearing takes place.

description View filing

Key Issues

• • Maritime law
• • Ex parte relief
• • Property or vessel dispute

smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

gavel

Order 3 days ago

The court issued an order in the case between Sausalito Yacht Harbor and the vessel S/V Dreamer in response to an urgent, one-sided request known as an ex parte application. This means the court made a decision without hearing from the othe

receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more

Order on Ex Parte Application ( 17

Open original open_in_new

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Case Timeline

2 events

info

Other April 17, 2026

5:26-cv-01921 FLORES OBREGON v. MULLIN et al

In a civil case filed in the Southern District of New York, petitioner Flores Obregón petitioned for a Writ of Habeas Corpus against defendants Mullin and others, marking the opening of an attorney civil case.

description View filing open_in_new

gavel

Order April 15, 2026

4:26-cv-01921 Sausalito Yacht Harbor v. S/V Dreamer

The court issued an order in the case between Sausalito Yacht Harbor and the vessel S/V Dreamer in response to an urgent, one-sided request known as an ex parte application. This means the court made a decision without hearing from the other party, likely due to the need for immediate action. Such orders can affect the rights or obligations of the parties involved before a full hearing takes place.

description View filing open_in_new

newspaper

Press Coverage

2 articles

All No paywall (2) Original reporting (2)

newspaper

pacer

5:26-cv-01921 FLORES OBREGON v. MULLIN et al

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attorney Civil Case Opening) ( 1

Apr 17, 2026

newspaper

pacer

4:26-cv-01921 Sausalito Yacht Harbor v. S/V Dreamer

Order on Ex Parte Application ( 17

Apr 15, 2026