4:25-cr-40043-1 USA v. Mercedes-Castillo
Case Summary
This criminal matter involves the United States prosecuting Mercedes-Castillo under docket 25-cr-40043. An order regarding excludable delay has been issued, which pertains to the calculation of time limits under the Speedy Trial Act or related procedural rules. Specific charges and case facts are not provided.
Stage
Court order issued
Timeline
6 events
Coverage
6 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Criminal prosecution
- • Excludable delay
- • Speedy Trial Act compliance
update What Changed This Week
Analysis & Coverage
Case Timeline
6 events4:25-cr-00435-3 USA v. Faasisila
In the case USA v. Mercedes-Castillo, the court issued an order related to a stipulation and proposed order in a separate but related case, USA v. Faasisila. This indicates coordination between the cases, possibly involving agreements between parties that the court has approved. Such orders help streamline proceedings and ensure both cases proceed efficiently.
4:25-cr-00435-2 USA v. Faasisila
In the case USA v. Mercedes-Castillo, a court order was issued referencing a stipulation and proposed order related to another case, USA v. Faasisila. This indicates that the court is addressing agreements or procedural matters that may affect both cases. Such orders help clarify the legal process and ensure that both parties agree on certain terms, which can streamline the case.
4:25-cr-00435-1 USA v. Faasisila
In the case USA v. Mercedes-Castillo, the court issued an order related to a stipulation and proposed order in a separate but related case, USA v. Faasisila. This indicates coordination or agreement between parties in these cases, which may affect how the proceedings move forward. Such orders help streamline the legal process by formalizing agreements.
4:25-cr-00301-1 USA v. Richmond
In the case USA v. Richmond, the court reached a verdict and proceeded with sentencing. This means the judge decided the defendant's guilt and determined the appropriate punishment. Sentencing is crucial as it finalizes the legal consequences for the defendant based on the verdict.
4:25-cr-40043-1 USA v. Mercedes-Castillo
The court issued an order regarding excludable delay in the case of USA v. Mercedes-Castillo. This means the court has determined certain periods of time will not count against the speedy trial clock, allowing the case to proceed without violating the defendant's right to a timely trial. This helps ensure the legal process is fair while accommodating necessary delays.
3:25-cr-00430-1 USA v. Perez
In the case USA v. Mercedes-Castillo, the court issued an order related to a stipulation in a separate but possibly connected case, USA v. Perez. This order likely addresses an agreement between parties that affects proceedings in one or both cases. Understanding this order helps clarify how the cases might be linked or how agreements impact the legal process.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
4:25-cr-00435-3 USA v. Faasisila
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 60
4:25-cr-00435-2 USA v. Faasisila
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 60
4:25-cr-00435-1 USA v. Faasisila
Stipulation and Proposed Order ( 60
4:25-cr-00301-1 USA v. Richmond
Sentencing ( 53
4:25-cr-40043-1 USA v. Mercedes-Castillo
Order On Excludable Delay ( 24
3:25-cr-00430-1 USA v. Perez
Order on Stipulation ( 24