3:24-cr-50050-1 USA v. Withrow
Case Summary
The United States is prosecuting Withrow in a criminal matter docketed as 3:24-cr-50050 in federal court. The case is at docket entry 47, a Certificate of Service, suggesting active pretrial proceedings. The record available is limited to a single procedural filing. No charging details, plea status, or trial schedule can be confirmed from the current summary.
Latest development
3:23-cr-50003-1 USA v. Mandujano
Motion · April 20, 2026
A Motion was filed.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Federal criminal charges against Withrow
- • Pretrial procedural posture
- • Identity of charges unknown from available record
update What Changed This Week
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Sealed Motion ( 70
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Case Timeline
4 events3:24-cr-00563-1 USA v. Paul
A Certificate of Service was filed in USA v. Withrow (3:24-cr-50050-1), confirming that a document — likely entry 47 — was formally served on the relevant parties. This is a procedural filing that proves notice was given, not a substantive ruling.
3:24-cr-00096-1 USA v. Freeman
The clerk issued a notice in USA v. Withrow (3:24-cr-50050-1), cross-referencing the related criminal case USA v. Freeman (3:24-cr-00096-1). Clerk's notices of this kind typically flag a procedural connection between cases — shared defendants, consolidated proceedings, or a transfer.
3:23-cr-50003-1 USA v. Mandujano
A Motion was filed.
3:24-cr-50050-1 USA v. Withrow
A judge modified Withrow's pretrial release conditions in USA v. Withrow, No. 3:24-cr-50050 (N.D. Ill.). The record does not specify which conditions changed or why, but any modification signals either a compliance problem on Withrow's part or a government motion to tighten supervision.
Press Coverage
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
2 outlets · 4 articles
Timeline events
4 records on file
Last updated
36 minutes ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.