2:26-cv-03735 Rogelio Santibanez v. Mohamed K Ghafeer
Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20) ( 12
In this civil case, Miller is the plaintiff against Draxxhall Management Corporation and others. The current activity involves an application for a clerk order to extend the time to answer, indicating procedural motions to manage deadlines. This suggests ongoing negotiations or preparation for defense.
Latest development
Order · April 15, 2026
In the case of Miller versus Draxxhall Management Corporation and others, the plaintiff requested the court clerk to grant an extension of time to file an answer to the complaint. This means the defendant is asking for more time to respond to the lawsuit. Granting this extension allows the defendant additional time to prepare their defense.
description View filingApplication for Clerk Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order ( 3
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
In a legal case involving ADA Disability Access Litigation, Rogelio Santibanez filed a lawsuit against Mohamed K Ghafeer, seeking to address accessibility issues and ensure compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This case highlights the ongoing efforts to protect the rights of individuals with disabilities and promote equal access to public spaces and services.
In the case of Miller versus Draxxhall Management Corporation and others, the plaintiff requested the court clerk to grant an extension of time to file an answer to the complaint. This means the defendant is asking for more time to respond to the lawsuit. Granting this extension allows the defendant additional time to prepare their defense.
Notice to Parties ADA Disability Access Litigation (ADR-20) ( 12
Application for Clerk Order to Ext Answer/Proposed Order ( 3
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 17 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.