2:26-cv-01050 Pat Suarez v. Vape Smoke Shops Inc et al
Case Summary
Pat Suarez has filed a lawsuit against Vape Smoke Shops Inc and others. The docket notes that mail was returned, which may indicate issues with service of process or communication with defendants. This procedural issue could delay the progress of the case and may require corrective action to properly notify defendants. The nature of the claims is not specified but likely relates to consumer or commercial disputes involving vape shops.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
4 events
Coverage
4 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Service of process
- • Procedural delays
- • Commercial dispute
- • Consumer issues
update What Changed This Week
Case Timeline
4 events2:26-cv-01980 Pat Suarez v. Famous Isaacs Cafe et al
In the case Pat Suarez v. Famous Isaacs Cafe et al, the court confirmed that the legal documents initiating the lawsuit were successfully delivered to the defendants within 21 days. This step is crucial because it officially notifies the defendants of the claims against them and starts the legal process.
2:26-cv-00868 Pat Suarez v. Gerardo Quevedo et al
In the case Pat Suarez v. Gerardo Quevedo et al, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). This means the plaintiff chose to end the case without the court deciding on the merits. Such dismissals often occur when parties reach a settlement or decide not to pursue the claim further.
2:26-cv-01309 Pat Suarez v. Compton Denn Inc. et al
In the case Pat Suarez v. Compton Denn Inc. et al, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a)(1). This means the plaintiff chose to end the case on their own before the defendant filed an answer or motion, allowing the possibility to refile in the future. It matters because the dismissal affects the progress of the litigation and the parties' legal strategies.
2:26-cv-01050 Pat Suarez v. Vape Smoke Shops Inc et al
In the case of Pat Suarez versus Vape Smoke Shops Inc and others, the court received a returned mail notification, indicating that a document sent by the court or one of the parties could not be delivered. This matters because it may delay communication and proceedings in the case until the correct address or contact information is confirmed.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
2:26-cv-01980 Pat Suarez v. Famous Isaacs Cafe et al
Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) ( 17
2:26-cv-00868 Pat Suarez v. Gerardo Quevedo et al
Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41a (1)) ( 19
2:26-cv-01309 Pat Suarez v. Compton Denn Inc. et al
Voluntary Dismissal of a Case (Pursuant to FRCP 41a (1)) ( 17
2:26-cv-01050 Pat Suarez v. Vape Smoke Shops Inc et al
Mail Returned ( 18