2:25-cv-07013 Thomas Angel Pedraza v. County of Los Angeles et al
Case Summary
In this civil case, Thomas Angel Pedraza is involved in litigation against the County of Los Angeles. The current docket entry concerns a motion or order related to the re-taxation of costs, which generally involves reconsideration or adjustment of court-awarded expenses. The underlying dispute details are not specified.
Stage
Active litigation
Timeline
12 events
Coverage
12 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Cost re-taxation
- • Civil litigation
- • Court expenses
update What Changed This Week
Case Timeline
12 events2:24-cv-05318 Estate of Maxwell Aguierre et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
In a legal case involving the County of Los Angeles, two lawsuits were filed - one by Thomas Angel Pedraza against the county, and another by the Estate of Maxwell Aguierre against the same county. The details of these cases are not specified in the provided information.
2:23-cv-00813 Tina Berg v. City of Los Angeles et al
In a legal case involving Tina Berg and the City of Los Angeles, a status report was filed, indicating the current progress and status of the ongoing litigation. This event is significant as it provides insight into the current state of the case and its potential implications for the parties involved.
2:26-cv-04064 White, Jr. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al
In a legal case involving County of Los Angeles, Thomas Angel Pedraza filed a complaint against the county and others, while White, Jr. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al was also filed. The complaint marks the beginning of legal proceedings and sets the stage for potential litigation between the parties involved.
2:24-cv-10938 Brandon Henderson v. City of Los Angeles et al
In a pretrial conference, the court addressed the final matters in two ongoing lawsuits: Thomas Angel Pedraza v. County of Los Angeles and Brandon Henderson v. City of Los Angeles. These cases involve legal disputes between individuals and the respective city and county governments.
5:24-cv-00473 Juan Marshall Rayford et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
In a legal proceeding involving multiple parties, including the County of Los Angeles, two lawsuits were scheduled for further proceedings. The first case, 2:25-cv-07013, involves Thomas Angel Pedraza, while the second case, 5:24-cv-00473, is a suit brought by Juan Marshall Rayford and others against the County of Los Angeles. The scheduling notice indicates that these cases will proceed to the next phase of the legal process.
2:25-cv-09447 Jonathan-Willis Taylor v. County of Los Angeles et al
In a legal case involving multiple plaintiffs against the County of Los Angeles, the amended complaint was filed, detailing the grievances and claims made by the plaintiffs against the county authorities. This event is significant as it sets the stage for further legal proceedings and potential resolutions for the plaintiffs.
2:24-cv-08883 Westley Henson et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
In a series of legal proceedings, Thomas Angel Pedraza and Westley Henson, along with others, are taking legal action against the County of Los Angeles. These cases, identified as 2:25-cv-07013 and 2:24-cv-08883, involve allegations and disputes that have significant implications for the county's operations and policies.
2:26-cv-00747 Brinah Milstein et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
In a legal proceeding involving multiple parties, including Brinah Milstein and the City of Los Angeles, the defendant, Thomas Angel Pedraza, filed an opposition to a motion. This motion was part of a larger case, 2:25-cv-07013, where Pedraza was challenging the actions of the County of Los Angeles and others.
2:25-cv-04155 Benjamin Torres v. County of Los Angeles et al
In the case of Benjamin Torres v. County of Los Angeles, the court issued an order related to the transcript of proceedings, as indicated by the filing of a Transcript Order Form (G-120). This means that an official record of the court hearing is being requested or prepared, which is essential for reviewing the case details accurately. Having a transcript ensures transparency and allows both parties to reference the exact statements made during the hearing.
2:21-cv-08624 Lacey Sculls et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
In the case of Lacey Sculls et al v. City of Los Angeles, the court issued an order to re-tax costs, which means the court is reviewing and possibly adjusting the amount of legal costs assigned to one party. This process ensures that the costs awarded are fair and accurately reflect the expenses incurred during the litigation.
2:24-cv-05277 Marlen Medina v. County of Los Angeles et al
In the case of Marlen Medina v. County of Los Angeles, a status report was filed to update the court on the current progress of the case. This helps the judge understand where the case stands and what steps might come next. Keeping the court informed ensures the case moves forward efficiently.
2:25-cv-07013 Thomas Angel Pedraza v. County of Los Angeles et al
A new case titled Thomas Angel Pedraza v. County of Los Angeles and others was filed, initiating legal proceedings. This marks the formal start of a dispute involving the plaintiff and the county, which will now proceed through the court system. Understanding this event is important as it sets the stage for potential legal actions and resolutions.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
2:24-cv-05318 Estate of Maxwell Aguierre et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
2:23-cv-00813 Tina Berg v. City of Los Angeles et al
Status Report ( 90
2:26-cv-04064 White, Jr. v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al
Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) ( 1
2:24-cv-10938 Brandon Henderson v. City of Los Angeles et al
Pretrial Conference - Final - optional html form ( 52
5:24-cv-00473 Juan Marshall Rayford et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
Text Only Scheduling Notice
2:25-cv-09447 Jonathan-Willis Taylor v. County of Los Angeles et al
Amended Complaint ( 46
2:24-cv-08883 Westley Henson et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
2:26-cv-00747 Brinah Milstein et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
in Opposition to Motion ( 32 )
2:25-cv-04155 Benjamin Torres v. County of Los Angeles et al
Transcript Order Form (G-120) ( 139
2:21-cv-08624 Lacey Sculls et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
Re-Tax Costs ( 268
2:24-cv-05277 Marlen Medina v. County of Los Angeles et al
Status Report ( 51