2:25-cv-02630 Saras Catano v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director
Case Summary
In the case of Saras Catano v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director, the plaintiff challenges actions taken by the ICE Field Office Director. The case involves procedural motions related to setting or resetting motion noting dates, indicating ongoing pretrial activity without substantive rulings disclosed.
Stage
Motion practice
Timeline
2 events
Coverage
2 articles
Sources
1
Key Issues
- • Immigration enforcement
- • Procedural motions
- • Administrative agency actions
update What Changed This Week
Case Timeline
2 events2:26-cv-00747 Lara v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director
In the case of Lara v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director, a motion was filed to set or reset the date when the court will consider this motion. This procedural step is important to manage the timeline of the case and ensure that all parties know when the motion will be addressed.
2:25-cv-02630 Saras Catano v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director
The court issued a brief two-minute order in the case of Saras Catano versus the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director. Although the details of the order are not specified, such orders typically address procedural matters or provide quick rulings. This step moves the case forward by clarifying the court's position or next actions.
Coverage Timeline
Press Coverage
2:26-cv-00747 Lara v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director
~Util - Set/Reset Motion Noting Date ( 11
2:25-cv-02630 Saras Catano v. United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement Field Office Director
2 - Minute Order ( 18