legal-news

KIWI Intellectual Assets Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

25-cv-00811
Active Active litigation Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

KIWI Intellectual Assets Corporation is pursuing a civil action against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and others. A recent order on a motion to withdraw suggests that counsel or a party sought to exit representation or participation in the case.

Latest development

2:25-cv-01212 Koyo Licensing LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al

Order · April 15, 2026

In the case involving Koyo Licensing LLC and Samsung Electronics, the court issued an order regarding a motion to stay, which means the court decided to temporarily pause the proceedings. This pause allows the parties to address certain issues or await the outcome of related matters before continuing with the case. Such orders help manage court resources and ensure fair handling of complex litigation.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Motion to withdraw
  • Representation issues
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

2 events

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

5 events
info
Other April 15, 2026

2:25-cv-01074 Biosonics Technology, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

In the case Biosonics Technology, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., the court granted an extension of time for one party to file necessary documents. This means the deadline for submitting certain filings was officially extended, allowing more time to prepare their case. Extensions like this help ensure all parties have adequate time to present their arguments properly.

info
Other April 15, 2026

2:24-cv-01057 XiFi Networks R&D, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

In the case of XiFi Networks R&D, Inc. versus Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., a new attorney has been granted permission to represent a party temporarily, even though they are not licensed in this jurisdiction. This allows the attorney to participate in the case and provide legal assistance. Such appearances help ensure that parties can have the best legal representation possible.

info
Other April 15, 2026

4:25-cv-00886 Competitive Access Systems, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD. et al

In the case of Competitive Access Systems, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., an attorney who is not licensed in the jurisdiction has formally requested permission to participate in the case. This is known as a 'Pro Hac Vice' appearance, allowing the attorney to represent a party temporarily. Such appearances are important to ensure that parties can be represented by specialized counsel even if they are not locally licensed.

gavel
Order April 15, 2026

2:25-cv-01212 Koyo Licensing LLC v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al

In the case involving Koyo Licensing LLC and Samsung Electronics, the court issued an order regarding a motion to stay, which means the court decided to temporarily pause the proceedings. This pause allows the parties to address certain issues or await the outcome of related matters before continuing with the case. Such orders help manage court resources and ensure fair handling of complex litigation.

gavel
Order April 15, 2026

2:25-cv-00811 KIWI Intellectual Assets Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al

The court issued an order regarding a request to withdraw, likely involving one of the parties or attorneys in the case between KIWI Intellectual Assets Corporation and Samsung Electronics. This means someone involved in the case is officially stepping back or being removed from participation. It matters because it can affect how the case proceeds and who represents the parties.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

5 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 5 articles

Timeline events

5 records on file

Last updated

3 days, 17 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.