sentencing

Federal Sentencing Proceeds in USA v. Cepeda Criminal Case

25-cr-00365
Active Verdict entered Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Federal prosecutors are moving toward sentencing in USA v. Cepeda, docketed as 25-cr-00365. The case has reached the penalty phase, meaning conviction or a guilty plea is already on record. Details on the underlying charges, the defendant's criminal history, and the government's sentencing recommendation are not available from the current docket entry. The court and jurisdiction remain unspecified in the available filing data.

Latest development

2:25-cr-00365-1 USA v. CEPEDA

Verdict · April 20, 2026

A federal jury returned a verdict against Cepeda in case 2:25-cr-00365-1, United States v. Cepeda, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The case now moves to sentencing, with a guidelines range suggesting 95 months.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Federal sentencing proceeding
  • Applicable sentencing guidelines range
  • Nature of underlying criminal charges
  • Defendant's criminal history and reducing factors
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.
chronic

The Story So Far

Updated 3 hours, 26 minutes ago

A federal jury convicted Cepeda on April 20, 2026, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The case, docketed as 2:25-cr-00365-1, now moves to sentencing. No judge has been formally assigned in the public record, and the original filing date is not yet reflected in available docket data.

The charges are not fully described in the current docket entries. The sentencing notation references a guideline range touching 95 — likely a reference to a Criminal History Category or offense level under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines — but the full calculation has not been made public.

The April 20 docket activity also flags a possible connection between this case and two others in the same district: USA v. Levett (2:25-cr-00733) and USA v. Hughes (2:25-cr-00641-1).

The nature of that link — whether co-conspirators, related conduct, or a shared filing event — is not clear from the available entries. That connection is worth watching. If Levett or Hughes are cooperating witnesses or co-defendants, their dispositions could affect Cepeda's sentencing posture.

For now, the conviction is the controlling fact. Cepeda faces a presentence investigation report, a government sentencing memorandum, and a defense response before any judge sets a date. The timeline from verdict to sentencing in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania typically runs three to five months, depending on complexity and whether either side contests the guidelines calculation.

smart_toy Juryvine case narrative generated from the full docket timeline. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

3 events
verified
Verdict April 20, 2026

2:25-cr-00365-1 USA v. CEPEDA

A federal jury returned a verdict against Cepeda in case 2:25-cr-00365-1, United States v. Cepeda, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The case now moves to sentencing, with a guidelines range suggesting 95 months.

info
Other April 20, 2026

2:25-cr-00733-1 USA v. LEVETT

Two federal criminal cases in the same district appear to be linked by this docket entry — USA v. Cepeda (2:25-cr-00365) and USA v. Levett (2:25-cr-00733) — but the filing description is blank, leaving the nature of the connection unclear. The cross-reference may signal a consolidation, a related-case designation, or a co-conspirator linkage, but nothing in the record confirms which.

info
Other April 20, 2026

2:25-cr-00641-1 USA v. Hughes

Two criminal cases — USA v. Cepeda (2:25-cr-00365) and USA v. Hughes (2:25-cr-00641) — appear to be linked by this docket entry, suggesting a consolidation, transfer, or related-case designation. The description field is empty, so the exact procedural action is unclear from the record alone.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

3 articles
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

2 outlets · 3 articles

Timeline events

3 records on file

Last updated

3 hours, 8 minutes ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.