legal-news

2:04-cr-14015-2 USA v. Preston

04-cr-14015
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

USA v. Preston, docket 04-cr-14015, involves a criminal matter where the court issued an order on a motion for early termination of supervised release. This indicates that the defendant is seeking to conclude post-conviction supervision ahead of schedule, and the court is considering this request.

Latest development

2:04-cr-14015-2 USA v. Preston

Order · April 15, 2026

In the case of USA v. Preston, the court issued an order regarding a request to end supervised release early. This means the defendant asked to finish their probation period ahead of schedule, and the court made a decision on that request. Such decisions affect how long individuals remain under court supervision after serving their sentence.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Motion for early termination of supervised release
  • Criminal sentencing and supervision
  • Judicial consideration of post-conviction relief
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 15, 2026

2:04-cr-14015-2 USA v. Preston

In the case of USA v. Preston, the court issued an order regarding a request to end supervised release early. This means the defendant asked to finish their probation period ahead of schedule, and the court made a decision on that request. Such decisions affect how long individuals remain under court supervision after serving their sentence.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 days, 18 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.