judicial-watch

Waterfront Construction, INC

26-cv-20136
Active Court order issued Sign in to follow this case
Share mail
Advertisement
description

Case Summary

Waterfront Construction, Inc. is involved in a civil case referenced by the docket number 26-cv-20136. The court issued an order referring the case to a magistrate judge, indicating that pretrial matters or discovery disputes may be managed by the magistrate to streamline proceedings. This procedural step is common in federal civil litigation to facilitate case management and does not provide substantive details about the nature of the dispute. The referral suggests the case is in its early to mid stages.

Latest development

1:26-cv-20136 Waterfront Construction, INC

Order · April 14, 2026

The court issued an order referring the case involving Waterfront Construction, INC to a magistrate judge. This means that a magistrate judge will now handle certain pretrial matters to help manage the case efficiently. This step is common in federal cases to streamline proceedings and reduce the workload of the main judge.

description View filing

Key Issues

  • Magistrate judge referral
  • Pretrial procedures
smart_toy Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records. How we verify our work.

update What Changed This Week

1 event

Juryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.

Advertisement

Case Timeline

1 event
gavel
Order April 14, 2026

1:26-cv-20136 Waterfront Construction, INC

The court issued an order referring the case involving Waterfront Construction, INC to a magistrate judge. This means that a magistrate judge will now handle certain pretrial matters to help manage the case efficiently. This step is common in federal cases to streamline proceedings and reduce the workload of the main judge.

Advertisement
newspaper

Press Coverage

1 article
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more

Sources tracked

1 outlet · 1 article

Timeline events

1 record on file

Last updated

3 days, 20 hours ago

Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.