2:26-cv-03053 Rigoberto Lopez v. Multiservices 1 et al
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held ( 12
In the case Rahamon v. Catletti et al, the court issued a notice to the attorney to submit or file a civil cover sheet. This procedural step is necessary to properly categorize and manage the civil litigation matter within the court system. No substantive details about the claims or parties involved are provided at this stage. The notice indicates early procedural activity in the case, likely shortly after the complaint was filed. The civil cover sheet will assist the court in tracking the case and assigning it to the appropriate docket and judge.
Latest development
Order · April 15, 2026
The court issued an in-chambers order in the case of Rigoberto Lopez v. Multiservices 1 et al without holding a formal hearing. This means the judge made a decision or gave instructions privately, which can help move the case forward efficiently. Such orders often address procedural or administrative matters.
description View filingMinutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held ( 12
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
The court issued an in-chambers order in the case of Rigoberto Lopez v. Multiservices 1 et al without holding a formal hearing. This means the judge made a decision or gave instructions privately, which can help move the case forward efficiently. Such orders often address procedural or administrative matters.
The court issued a notice to the attorney in the case Rahamon v. Catletti et al, instructing them to submit or file a civil cover sheet. This document is necessary to provide the court with basic information about the case. Filing it helps the court properly categorize and manage the case.
Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held ( 12
Notice to Attorney to Submit/File Civil Cover Sheet
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 2 articles
Timeline events
2 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 16 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.