newspaper
pacer
1:26-cv-00342 Cardoza v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Social Security Action - Plaintiff's Brief ( 10
Apr 17, 2026
appeal
court-watch
judicial-watch
Hershfeldt v. Johnston et al
26-cv-00342
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
Hershfeldt v. Johnston et al involves an appeal from a magistrate judge's decision to the district court. The appeal challenges the magistrate's ruling, seeking a review and possible reversal or modification. This procedural step reflects the parties' efforts to contest findings or orders issued at the magistrate level before proceeding further in litigation.
Latest development
1:26-cv-00342 Hershfeldt v. Johnston et al
Appeal · April 15, 2026
In the case Hershfeldt v. Johnston et al, the parties have appealed a decision made by the Magistrate Judge to the District Court. This means they are asking a higher court to review and possibly change the earlier ruling. Such appeals are important because they ensure that legal decisions are thoroughly examined for fairness and accuracy.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Magistrate judge rulings
- • Appeal procedures
- • Judicial review standards
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
1 event
arrow_upward
Appeal
3 days ago
In the case Hershfeldt v. Johnston et al, the parties have appealed a decision made by the Magistrate Judge to the District Court. This means they are asking a higher court to review and possibly change the earlier ruling. Such appeals are
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court ( 52
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
3 events
info
Other
April 17, 2026
1:26-cv-00342 Cardoza v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
In the federal court case 1:26-cv-00342, Cardoza v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, the plaintiff presented their brief, outlining their legal arguments and claims against the Social Security Administration.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
6:25-cr-00034-3 USA v. Johnson et al
In the case Hershfeldt v. Johnston et al, a related criminal case USA v. Johnson et al involved the forfeiture of property. This means the court ordered certain assets to be seized, likely because they were connected to illegal activity. This action is important as it helps enforce laws by removing assets gained through or used in crimes.
arrow_upward
Appeal
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-00342 Hershfeldt v. Johnston et al
In the case Hershfeldt v. Johnston et al, the parties have appealed a decision made by the Magistrate Judge to the District Court. This means they are asking a higher court to review and possibly change the earlier ruling. Such appeals are important because they ensure that legal decisions are thoroughly examined for fairness and accuracy.
Advertisement
newspaper
3 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
1:26-cv-00342 Hershfeldt v. Johnston et al
Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court ( 52
Apr 15, 2026
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 3 articles
Timeline events
3 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 20 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.