newspaper
pacer
8:26-cv-00219 Alexander Manuel Almeida Sanchez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Generic Text Only Entry
Apr 17, 2026
legal-news
Cruz v. Bisignano
26-cv-00219
Advertisement
description
Case Summary
The case Cruz v. Bisignano involves a dispute documented within the SSA Administrative Record. Specific details of the claims or issues are not provided, but the case appears to relate to matters overseen by the Social Security Administration or similar administrative context. The docket number is 26-cv-00219.
Latest development
1:25-cv-05796 Austin v. Bisignano
Order · April 15, 2026
In the case of Austin v. Bisignano, the court issued an order regarding a motion requesting permission to file certain documents. This means the court decided whether to allow additional filings, which can impact how the case proceeds. Such decisions affect the parties' ability to present evidence or arguments.
description View filingKey Issues
- • Administrative record review
- • Social Security-related claims
- • Procedural compliance
smart_toy
Juryvine case summary generated from primary court records.
How we verify our work.
update What Changed This Week
1 event
gavel
Order
3 days ago
In the case of Austin v. Bisignano, the court issued an order regarding a motion requesting permission to file certain documents. This means the court decided whether to allow additional filings, which can impact how the case proceeds. Such
receipt_long Source (filing) expand_more
Order on Motion for Leave to File ( 23
Open original open_in_newJuryvine summaries are generated from court records. Expand "Source" on any row to see the underlying filing.
article
Analysis & Coverage
Case Analysis
Apr 16, 2026
Cruz v. Bisignano: SSA Administrative Record Review
Cruz v. Bisignano (26-cv-00219) examines SSA administrative record review and procedural compliance in a civil case with multiple related filings …
Case Analysis
Apr 16, 2026
Cruz v. Bisignano: Social Security Administrative Review
Cruz v. Bisignano examines administrative record review and procedural compliance in a Social Security case, with related filings and orders …
Case Analysis
Apr 16, 2026
Cruz v. Bisignano: Social Security Administrative Record Review
Cruz v. Bisignano examines procedural compliance in SSA claims, with key events on April 15, 2026, impacting administrative record review.
Advertisement
Case Timeline
20 events
info
Other
April 17, 2026
8:26-cv-00219 Alexander Manuel Almeida Sanchez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Generic Text Only Entry
info
Other
April 17, 2026
8:26-cv-00219 Alexander Manuel Almeida Sanchez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Generic Text Only Entry
info
Other
April 17, 2026
2:26-cv-00219 The NOCO Company v. TD Logistics, Inc. et al
The lawsuit between The NOCO Company and TD Logistics, Inc. was dismissed, meaning the case will no longer proceed to trial or resolution. This decision was made by the court, signaling that the legal claims against TD Logistics were deemed insufficient or without merit.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-04236 Perez v. Bisignano
A new case titled Perez v. Bisignano, numbered 1:26-cv-04236, was filed alongside the existing case Cruz v. Bisignano, numbered 1:26-cv-00219. This indicates multiple legal actions involving Bisignano are occurring simultaneously, potentially related or coordinated. It matters because it could affect how the court manages and resolves these related disputes.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-04237 Relyea v. Bisignano
In the case Cruz v. Bisignano, another related case titled Relyea v. Bisignano was noted or referenced. This indicates that there may be multiple similar lawsuits involving Bisignano, potentially consolidating or highlighting a broader legal issue. Understanding these connections helps clarify the scope and impact of the litigation.
gavel
Order
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-05796 Austin v. Bisignano
In the case of Austin v. Bisignano, the court issued an order regarding a motion requesting permission to file certain documents. This means the court decided whether to allow additional filings, which can impact how the case proceeds. Such decisions affect the parties' ability to present evidence or arguments.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-12444 Potirala v. Bisignano
In the case Potirala v. Bisignano, the court granted an extension of time for the parties to file their response or reply. This means the deadline to submit important legal documents was officially extended, allowing more time for preparation. Such extensions can impact the pace and strategy of the case.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:23-cv-05872 Stegmann v. Bisignano
In the case Stegmann v. Bisignano, the court granted an extension of time for one party to file their response or reply. This means the party has more time to prepare their arguments, which can affect the pace of the case. Extensions like this are common and help ensure that all parties have a fair chance to present their positions.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-12271 Kennedy v. Bisignano
In the case of Cruz v. Bisignano, the court granted permission to file a document related to another case, Kennedy v. Bisignano. This procedural step allows the parties to submit important information or evidence that could impact the proceedings. It matters because it ensures that relevant documents are officially included in the court record for consideration.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-07765 Santoyo v. Bisignano
In the case Cruz v. Bisignano, an event related to another case, Santoyo v. Bisignano, was noted. This indicates that the two cases may be connected or that developments in one case could impact the other. Understanding this relationship is important for tracking how legal issues are progressing across related lawsuits.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-04227 Desmedt v. Bisignano
In the case Cruz v. Bisignano, a related event titled Desmedt v. Bisignano was noted, indicating a connection or similarity between the two cases. This suggests that the court is tracking related lawsuits involving the same defendant, Bisignano, which may impact how the cases are handled or consolidated.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-04226 Morales v. Bisignano
In the case Morales v. Bisignano, the court allowed the plaintiff to proceed 'in forma pauperis,' meaning they can continue the lawsuit without paying court fees due to financial hardship. This decision enables individuals who cannot afford legal costs to access the justice system. It matters because it ensures that financial barriers do not prevent people from pursuing their legal rights.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-02022 Sokolowski v. Bisignano
In the case Cruz v. Bisignano, a judgment was entered related to the separate but connected case Sokolowski v. Bisignano. This indicates the court has made a formal decision that could impact both cases. Such judgments help resolve legal disputes and clarify the rights of the parties involved.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-06115 Wallace v. Bisignano
In the case Cruz v. Bisignano, there was a development related to attorney fees that also references the earlier case Wallace v. Bisignano. This suggests that the court addressed or discussed the issue of legal fees, which can impact the financial responsibilities of the parties involved. Understanding attorney fees is important because it affects how the costs of litigation are allocated.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:25-cv-13950 Arsene Versailles v. Bisignano
In the case Arsene Versailles v. Bisignano, the court granted an extension of time to file a document. This means one party was given extra time beyond the original deadline to submit important paperwork. Such extensions can affect the pace and preparation of the case.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-10218 Michalik v. Bisignano
In the case Michalik v. Bisignano, the parties agreed to have a U.S. Magistrate Judge handle the case instead of a district judge. This means the magistrate judge will oversee proceedings and make decisions, which can speed up the case process. Such consent often helps streamline court management and reduce delays.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-10216 Busby v. Bisignano
In the case Busby v. Bisignano, the parties agreed to have a US Magistrate Judge handle the case instead of a District Judge. This means the Magistrate Judge will oversee proceedings and make decisions, which can speed up the process. Consent to jurisdiction allows for a more efficient resolution of the dispute.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
3:26-cv-50148 Olsen v. Bisignano
In the case of Olsen v. Bisignano, the court allowed the plaintiff to proceed 'in forma pauperis,' meaning they can continue the lawsuit without paying court fees due to financial hardship. This helps ensure that people without money can still access the legal system. It matters because it promotes fairness by removing financial barriers to justice.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
1:26-cv-11055 Swift v. Bisignano
In the case Swift v. Bisignano, an administrative record from the Social Security Administration (SSA) was filed or referenced. This document is important because it contains official information and evidence relevant to the case. Such records help the court understand the background and details necessary for making a fair decision.
info
Other
April 15, 2026
3:26-cv-30023 Suffriti v. Bisignano
In the case of Suffriti v. Bisignano, an administrative record from the Social Security Administration was submitted to the court. This document contains important evidence and information relevant to the case. It matters because it helps the court understand the background and details necessary for making a decision.
Loading more events...
Advertisement
newspaper
22 articles
Press Coverage
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
1:25-cv-12444 Potirala v. Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 22
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
pacer
1:23-cv-05872 Stegmann v. Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 29
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
1:25-cv-13950 Arsene Versailles v. Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Document ( 11
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
pacer
1:26-cv-10218 Michalik v. Bisignano
Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge ( 11
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
pacer
1:26-cv-10216 Busby v. Bisignano
Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge ( 13
Apr 15, 2026
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
newspaper
pacer
1:25-cv-10752 Lovelace v. Bisignano
Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ( 18
Apr 15, 2026
settings_backup_restore Data provenance expand_more
Sources tracked
1 outlet · 22 articles
Timeline events
23 records on file
Last updated
3 days, 17 hours ago
Juryvine aggregates docket entries from PACER/CourtListener, press coverage, and GDELT signals. Ingestion timestamps do not appear in the What Changed feed — that reflects real court activity only.